AWARE [SYSTEMS] Imaging expertise for the Delphi developer
AWare Systems, Imaging expertise for the Delphi developer, Home TIFF and LibTiff Mailing List Archive

LibTiff Mailing List

TIFF and LibTiff Mailing List Archive
May 2004

Previous Thread
Next Thread

Previous by Thread
Next by Thread

Previous by Date
Next by Date

Contact

The TIFF Mailing List Homepage
This list is run by Frank Warmerdam
Archive maintained by AWare Systems



Valid HTML 4.01!



Thread

2004.05.27 01:15 "large TIFF - two alternatives", by Steve Carlsen
2004.05.27 07:30 "Re: large TIFF - two alternatives", by Andrey Kiselev
2004.05.27 15:02 "Re: large TIFF - two alternatives", by Steve Carlsen
2004.05.27 09:25 "Re: large TIFF - two alternatives", by Rob Tillaart
2004.05.27 14:00 "Re: large TIFF - two alternatives", by Steve Carlsen
2004.05.27 10:43 "Re: large TIFF - two alternatives", by John Aldridge
2004.05.27 12:49 "Re: large TIFF - two alternatives", by Andrey Kiselev
2004.05.27 13:05 "Re: large TIFF - two alternatives", by Frank Warmerdam
2004.05.27 18:31 "Re: large TIFF - two alternatives", by Chris Cox
2004.06.01 11:50 "Re: large TIFF - two alternatives", by John Aldridge
2004.06.01 15:46 "Re: large TIFF - two alternatives", by Steve Carlsen
2004.06.01 16:27 "Re: large TIFF - two alternatives", by Ed Grissom
2004.06.02 14:20 "Re: large TIFF - two alternatives", by Steve Carlsen
2004.06.03 06:40 "Re: large TIFF - two alternatives", by Rob Tillaart
2004.05.27 16:37 "Re: large TIFF - two alternatives", by Frank Warmerdam
2004.05.27 18:41 "Re: large TIFF - two alternatives", by Chris Cox
2004.05.27 19:15 "Re: large TIFF - two alternatives", by Frank Warmerdam
2004.06.04 13:31 "Re: large TIFF - two alternatives", by Ed Grissom
2004.06.04 14:01 "Re: large TIFF - two alternatives", by Frank Warmerdam
2004.06.04 15:03 "Re: large TIFF - two alternatives", by Ed Grissom
2004.06.09 20:33 "Re: large TIFF - two alternatives", by Steve Carlsen
2004.06.10 07:37 "Re: large TIFF - two alternatives", by Rob Tillaart
2004.06.10 20:41 "Re: large TIFF - two alternatives", by Chris Cox
2004.06.10 21:11 "Re: large TIFF - two alternatives", by Phillip Crews

2004.06.01 11:50 "Re: large TIFF - two alternatives", by John Aldridge

I wrote:

> This is a serious question, and not intended as a flame:  if I need to 
> support a new file format to get >2/4GB support, why wouldn't I just use 
> PNG?

...and got several informative answers which basically fall in to two camps:


(a) So PNG can handle images > 4GB. That's precious little use without 
the ability to do random access to parts of the image.

Having thought about it a bit, I agree entirely.


(b) Tiff can handle <data-format-of-choice-for-my-application>.

This is both a strength /and/ a weakness. The fact that Tiff has so many 
different ways of storing data is handy for the writer, but a real pain 
for the reader. Maybe PNG isn't flexible enough, but Tiff is so flexible 
that supporting the full spec is a lot of work.

-- 
Thanks,
John