AWARE [SYSTEMS] Imaging expertise for the Delphi developer
AWare Systems, Imaging expertise for the Delphi developer, Home TIFF and LibTiff Mailing List Archive

LibTiff Mailing List

TIFF and LibTiff Mailing List Archive
May 2004

Previous Thread
Next Thread

Previous by Thread
Next by Thread

Previous by Date
Next by Date

Contact

The TIFF Mailing List Homepage
This list is run by Frank Warmerdam
Archive maintained by AWare Systems



Valid HTML 4.01!



Thread

2004.05.13 08:37 "Easy and low resource rotating of tiff images", by Steven Enderle
2004.05.13 09:09 "Re: Easy and low resource rotating of tiff images", by Steven Enderle
2004.05.13 09:49 "Re: Easy and low resource rotating of tiff images", by Andrey Kiselev
2004.05.13 11:45 "Re: Easy and low resource rotating of tiff images", by Steven Enderle
2004.05.13 13:01 "Re: Easy and low resource rotating of tiff images", by Rob Tillaart
2004.05.13 13:38 "Low resource tiff rotation", by Steven Enderle
2004.05.13 15:17 "Re: Low resource tiff rotation", by Bob Friesenhahn
2004.05.13 12:01 "Re: Easy and low resource rotating of tiff images", by Joris Van Damme
2004.05.13 12:49 "Re: Easy and low resource rotating of tiff images", by Rob Tillaart
2004.05.13 12:48 "Re: Easy and low resource rotating of tiff images", by Rob Tillaart
2004.05.13 15:13 "Re: Easy and low resource rotating of tiff images", by Richard Morris
2004.05.14 13:11 "Re: Easy and low resource rotating of tiff images", by Steven Enderle

2004.05.13 15:17 "Re: Low resource tiff rotation", by Bob Friesenhahn

On Thu, 13 May 2004, Steven Enderle wrote:

> This is what i did after trying "convert" of ImageMagick. It uses far
> more than 500MB per Image, like "convert" does. As i wrote, the images
> are under 150KB. Anyway, it takes 10 or more seconds to process a single
> image.

Resource consumption may be reduced 50% by building ImageMagick for an
8-bit quantum size rather than 16 bits.

You did not describe your image, but I assume that it is monochrome.
Rotations to anything but 90 degree increments require that new pixel
values be computed in order to avoid distortion.  This means that a
monochrome image must be promoted to grayscale.  If this promotion is
not done, then the result will look bad.

ImageMagick does its pixel manipulations using RGBA style pixels so it
is very inefficient for monochrome images.

Bob
======================================
Bob Friesenhahn
bfriesen@simple.dallas.tx.us
http://www.simplesystems.org/users/bfriesen