2008.07.28 08:49 "[Tiff] CVS access", by Mateusz Łoskot
-
2008.07.28 13:01 "[Fwd: Re: [Tiff] CVS access]", by Edward Lam
- 2008.07.28 14:02 "Re: [Tiff] CVS access", by Mateusz Loskot
-
2008.08.11 20:55 "Re: [Tiff] windows 64 bit build", by Bob Friesenhahn
-
2008.08.11 19:35 "Re: [Tiff] windows 64 bit build", by Mikhail Kruk
- 2008.08.11 17:57 "[Tiff] windows 64 bit build", by Mikhail Kruk
- 2008.08.11 20:03 "Re: [Tiff] windows 64 bit build", by Edward Lam
- 2008.08.11 20:51 "Re: [Tiff] windows 64 bit build", by Bob Friesenhahn
-
2008.08.11 19:35 "Re: [Tiff] windows 64 bit build", by Mikhail Kruk
2008.08.11 20:55 "Re: [Tiff] windows 64 bit build", by Bob Friesenhahn
On Mon, 11 Aug 2008, Edward Lam wrote:
> No, I think the real bug is that TIFFFdOpen() should take a thandle_t as its > first parameter instead of int. Given the File I/O agnostic interface of
This does seem to be the most reasonable solution. It will be a bit confusing to Unix users who are used to seeing 'int' associated with file descriptors.
Bob
======================================
Bob Friesenhahn
bfriesen@simple.dallas.tx.us, http://www.simplesystems.org/users/bfriesen/
GraphicsMagick Maintainer, http://www.GraphicsMagick.org/