AWARE [SYSTEMS] Imaging expertise for the Delphi developer
AWare Systems, Imaging expertise for the Delphi developer, Home TIFF and LibTiff Mailing List Archive

LibTiff Mailing List

TIFF and LibTiff Mailing List Archive
June 1999

Previous Thread
Next Thread

Previous by Thread
Next by Thread

Previous by Date
Next by Date

Contact

The TIFF Mailing List Homepage
This list is run by Frank Warmerdam
Archive maintained by AWare Systems



Valid HTML 4.01!



Thread

1999.06.20 23:47 "TIFF Version 42 -> 45", by Niles Ritter
1999.06.21 14:01 "TIFF Version 42 -> 45", by Gregory W Cook
1999.06.22 03:04 "Re: TIFF Version 42 -> 45", by Niles Ritter

1999.06.20 23:47 "TIFF Version 42 -> 45", by Niles Ritter

Regarding the "next generation" TIFF version number 42 issue,
should it become necessary to promote the value:

   TIFF version = 45

Discussion:

The choice of version number is very important. The number (42)
was documented as to be changed only if there was such a radical
change in the TIFF structure as to contain no useful information for a
current TIFF compliant reader.

This issue has been raised regarding what the next version
number should be (interestingly, 43 was not proposed, even though
it is well known that software versions that are odd (especially prime)
tend to work better than even or composite versions. I do not know why,
but it even seems to apply to Beethoven symphonies).

Should it be necessary to change this value, the only appropriate
value in the original spirit of the design would be 45.

Here is my chain of reasoning:

1) In the original TIFF 4.0 specification, the value 42 was chosen
"for its deep philosophical significance". In the later 5.0 and 6.0 spec

the wording regarding 42 was changed to it being an "arbitrary
but carefully chosen number".

2) The reference is the "Hitchiker Guide to the Galaxy", in which
"42" is revealed as the answer to the universe, raising the issue
of what the "ultimate question" was.

3) In a later part of Douglas Adams' story it was revealed that
the ultimate question was "What is 6 x 9?".

4) Endless debate regarding how 42 could be the correct answer (e.g, the

string "42" is ambiguous, and could be correct in base 13) are moot in
terms of TIFF, which having specified a binary (base 2) representation
could not escape having an incorrect value.

Conclusion: if we wish to make TIFF "right", then the correct answer
to the ultimate question (which in base 10 is represented as 45), should

be installed into the next-generation TIFF header.

Ergo, version=45  (hex: 0x2d)

Ref: The Deep Thought "42" page at

  http://www.empirenet.com/personal/dljones/index.html

(TIFF is given honorable mention).

  --Niles.