2009.10.06 22:07 "[Tiff] SourceForge terms changes, heads up", by Bob Friesenhahn
- 2009.10.06 23:19 "Re: [Tiff] SourceForge terms changes, heads up", by Graeme Gill
-
2009.10.07 20:11 "Re: [Tiff] Wrong Native Bit Order on Intel x86_64", by Eskandar Ensafi
- 2009.10.07 19:25 "[Tiff] Wrong Native Bit Order on Intel x86_64", by Eskandar Ensafi
- 2009.10.07 20:24 "Re: [Tiff] Wrong Native Bit Order on Intel x86_64", by Toby Thain
- 2009.10.07 21:26 "Re: [Tiff] Wrong Native Bit Order on Intel x86_64", by Bob Friesenhahn
- 2009.10.08 15:09 "Re: [Tiff] SourceForge terms changes, heads up", by Ron
2009.10.06 23:19 "Re: [Tiff] SourceForge terms changes, heads up", by Graeme Gill
Luckily, libtiff itself does not rely on SourceForge but it seems that the SourceForge change in terms may impact users of libtiff and other historical libraries which lack an OSI-Approved License.
I guess then, that SourceForge will loose a lot of projects.
Graeme Gill.