AWARE [SYSTEMS] Imaging expertise for the Delphi developer
AWare Systems, Imaging expertise for the Delphi developer, Home TIFF and LibTiff Mailing List Archive

LibTiff Mailing List

TIFF and LibTiff Mailing List Archive
October 2000

Previous Thread
Next Thread

Previous by Thread
Next by Thread

Previous by Date
Next by Date

Contact

The TIFF Mailing List Homepage
This list is run by Frank Warmerdam
Archive maintained by AWare Systems



Valid HTML 4.01!



Thread

2000.10.09 10:24 "IFD / Image data ordering", by Brian Stafford
2000.10.10 03:22 "Re: IFD / Image data ordering", by Niles Ritter
2000.10.10 06:09 "Re: IFD / Image data ordering", by Tom Lane
2000.10.10 08:29 "Re: IFD / Image data ordering", by Martin Bailey
2000.10.10 08:41 "Re: IFD / Image data ordering", by Brian Stafford
2000.10.10 10:39 "Re: IFD / Image data ordering", by Andreas R Kleinert
2000.10.10 09:26 "Re: IFD / Image data ordering", by Brian Stafford

2000.10.10 08:41 "Re: IFD / Image data ordering", by Brian Stafford

Tom Lane wrote:
>
> Sheesh.  How did RFC 2301 get accepted? ...

RFC 2301 mandates a *profile* of TIFF which must be used by conforming
TIFF writers and which is fully compliant with the TIFF 6.0 specification.
The reason for the forward reference only rule is so that the TIFFs are
usable by limited memory devices which cannot buffer entire files prior
to processing.  Such devices are expected to become commonplace in the
Internet Fax appliance market and one of RFC 2301's goals is not to
prohibit such devices.

IIRC, TIFF 6.0 states that compliant readers must be prepared to handle
any ordering of the structures within a TIFF but does not mandate any
ordering of the internal structure while writing a TIFF.  An RFC 2301
TIFF writer is therefore also a TIFF 6.0 writer, however an RFC 2301
reader is neither required to be, nor prohibited from being a TIFF 6.0
compliant reader.

> ...  Obviously they carefully
> refrained from allowing it to be reviewed by anyone with a clue
> about TIFF.

The IETF FAX working group has considerable TIFF expertise; the WG has
additional constraints which do not apply in other TIFF applications.

--
Brian Stafford, OfficeLogic International Ltd.
PGP fingerprint: 23DE 0A02 95B2 EC3C D521  0CD1 97D8 6BF2 B673 DC11