| AWARE [SYSTEMS] | Imaging expertise for the Delphi developer | |||||||
![]() |
TIFF and LibTiff Mailing List Archive | |||||||
LibTiff Mailing List
TIFF and LibTiff Mailing List Archive Contact
The TIFF Mailing List Homepage |
Thread2006.11.20 15:32 "Re: tiffinfo large file issue", by Andrey KiselevOn Mon, Nov 20, 2006 at 01:19:37PM +0200, Paul Surgeon wrote: > mosaic.tif: > Magic: 0x4949 <little-endian> Version: 0x2a > Directory 0: offset 2707918856 (0xa1679008) next 0 (0) > ImageWidth (256) SHORT (3) 1<31515> > ImageLength (257) SHORT (3) 1<28553> > BitsPerSample (258) SHORT (3) 3<8 8 8> > Compression (259) SHORT (3) 1<1> > Photometric (262) SHORT (3) 1<2> > SamplesPerPixel (277) SHORT (3) 1<3> > MinSampleValue (280) SHORT (3) 3<1 1 1> > MaxSampleValue (281) SHORT (3) 3<255 255 255> > PlanarConfig (284) SHORT (3) 1<2> > TileWidth (322) SHORT (3) 1<64> > TileLength (323) SHORT (3) 1<64> > TileOffsets (324) LONG (4) 661113<8 12296 24584 36872 49160 61448 73736 86024 > 98312 110600 122888 135176 147464 159752 172040 184328 196616 208904 221192 > 233480 245768 258056 270344 282632 ...> > TileByteCounts (325) LONG (4) 661113<4096 4096 4096 4096 4096 4096 4096 4096 > 4096 4096 4096 4096 4096 4096 4096 4096 4096 4096 4096 4096 4096 4096 4096 > 4096 ...> > SampleFormat (339) SHORT (3) 3<1 1 1> > 33550 (0x830e) DOUBLE (12) 3<2 2 0> > 33922 (0x8482) DOUBLE (12) 6<0 0 0 344704 4.70706e+06 0> > 34735 (0x87af) SHORT (3) 32<1 1 0 7 1024 0 1 1 1025 0 1 2 2048 0 1 4269 2057 > 34736 1 0 2058 34736 1 1 ...> > 34736 (0x87b0) DOUBLE (12) 2<6.37814e+06 6.35675e+06> Hmm, I prepared the similar file and there is no problem with it: test.tif: Magic: 0x4949 <little-endian> Version: 0x2a Directory 0: offset 2707918856 (0xa1679008) next 0 (0) ImageWidth (256) SHORT (3) 1<31515> ImageLength (257) SHORT (3) 1<28553> BitsPerSample (258) SHORT (3) 3<8 8 8> Compression (259) SHORT (3) 1<1> Photometric (262) SHORT (3) 1<2> SamplesPerPixel (277) SHORT (3) 1<3> PlanarConfig (284) SHORT (3) 1<2> TileWidth (322) SHORT (3) 1<64> TileLength (323) SHORT (3) 1<64> TileOffsets (324) LONG (4) 661113<8 4104 8200 12296 16392 20488 24584 28680 32776 36872 40968 45064 49160 53256 57352 61448 65544 69640 73736 77832 81928 86024 90120 94216 ...> TileByteCounts (325) LONG (4) 661113<4096 4096 4096 4096 4096 4096 4096 4096 4096 4096 4096 4096 4096 4096 4096 4096 4096 4096 4096 4096 4096 4096 4096 4096 ...> SampleFormat (339) SHORT (3) 3<1 1 1> (tile ordering is different, but it should not have any impact). I do not have a clue what is going wrong on your system. Could you try the recent libtiff snapshot from CVS? Best regards, Andrey -- Andrey V. Kiselev ICQ# 26871517 |
|||||||