AWARE [SYSTEMS] Imaging expertise for the Delphi developer
AWare Systems, Imaging expertise for the Delphi developer, Home TIFF and LibTiff Mailing List Archive

LibTiff Mailing List

TIFF and LibTiff Mailing List Archive
November 2006

Previous Thread
Next Thread

Previous by Thread
Next by Thread

Previous by Date
Next by Date

Contact

The TIFF Mailing List Homepage
This list is run by Frank Warmerdam
Archive maintained by AWare Systems



Valid HTML 4.01!



Thread

2006.11.24 10:23 "Windows HD Photo - any interest?", by Brad Hards
2006.11.24 16:02 "Re: Windows HD Photo - any interest?", by Andrey Kiselev
2006.11.24 21:53 "Re: Windows HD Photo - any interest?", by Brad Hards
2006.11.24 23:06 "Re: Windows HD Photo - any interest?", by Bob Friesenhahn
2006.11.25 01:53 "Re: Windows HD Photo - any interest?", by Brad Hards
2006.11.25 10:20 "Re: Windows HD Photo - any interest?", by Andrey Kiselev
2006.11.25 13:59 "Re: Windows HD Photo - any interest?", by Sachin Garg
2006.11.25 15:01 "Re: Windows HD Photo - any interest?", by Andrey Kiselev
2006.11.25 15:56 "Re: Windows HD Photo - any interest?", by Frank Warmerdam
2006.11.25 18:00 "Re: Windows HD Photo - any interest?", by Sachin Garg
2006.11.25 15:40 "Re: Windows HD Photo - any interest?", by Andrey Kiselev
2006.11.25 18:41 "Re: Windows HD Photo - any interest?", by Sachin Garg
2006.11.26 15:16 "Re: Windows HD Photo - any interest?", by Leonard Rosenthol
2006.11.26 19:59 "Re: Windows HD Photo - any interest?", by Brad Hards
2006.11.26 20:57 "Re: Windows HD Photo - any interest?", by Bob Friesenhahn

2006.11.25 01:53 "Re: Windows HD Photo - any interest?", by Brad Hards

On Saturday 25 November 2006 10:06, Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
> Currently libtiff does not contain any algorithms protected by a
> patent (to the best of our knowledge).  This allows it to be
> distributed for any application.  Is the Windows HD Photo codec
> protected by any Microsoft (or other vendor ) patents?
There are probably some patents that are at least partly applicable. Probably 
the cleanest way is to get Microsoft to provide a statement about whether 
there are any (that they know of), and if so, whether they are willing to 
provide a royalty free license. If there are (or might be) some, and they 
aren't willing to make an explicit license grant, then it is probably a dead 
format anyway, and not worth implementing.

> The JBIG2 codec is also interesting, but implementing support for it
> is discouraged by protective patents.
I think there will always be some patent issues - just a matter of how 
enforceable and what licenses you can get. For example, see:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/JPEG#Potential_patent_issues

I'll send a query to the contact email address at Microsoft.

Brad