-
2000.01.29 09:48 "Re: tiff2ps: G4 compression in PostScript]", by Frank D. Cringle
-
2000.01.29 16:12 "Re: tiff2ps: G4 compression in PostScript]", by Paul Kaiser
-
2000.01.29 17:03 "G4 and DCT documentation [was: tiff2ps: G4 compression in PostScript]", by Tom Kacvinsky
- 2000.02.01 04:16 "Re: G4 and DCT documentation [was: tiff2ps: G4 compression in PostScript]", by Tom Lane
- 2000.01.29 19:27 "Re: tiff2ps: G4 compression in PostScript]", by Stanislav Brabec
- 2000.01.31 10:45 "Re: tiff2ps: G4 compression in PostScript]", by Martin Bailey
-
2000.01.29 17:03 "G4 and DCT documentation [was: tiff2ps: G4 compression in PostScript]", by Tom Kacvinsky
-
2000.01.29 16:12 "Re: tiff2ps: G4 compression in PostScript]", by Paul Kaiser
- 2000.01.29 18:27 "Re: tiff2ps: G4 compression in PostScript]", by Helge Blischke
- 2000.02.01 21:38 "Re: tiff2ps: G4 compression in PostScript]", by Paul Kaiser
2000.01.31 10:45 "Re: tiff2ps: G4 compression in PostScript]", by Martin Bailey
I suspect that a PostScript interpreter has specific restrictions, then. I just ordered the "Green Book" on PostScript programming, so I'll see in a few days. I have all of the other PostScript books, all of the recent PostScript and PDF stuff of the Adobe site -- none of it sheds light on any of it. I hope the green book says "it has to be this-a-way" so we can get on with this.
The Green Book is Level 1 only, so it certainly won't cover the CCITTFaxDecode filter, because that was added in Level 2.
Regards
Martin Bailey
-------------------------------------------------------------
Senior Technical Consultant martinb@harlequin.com
Digital Print & Publishing +44 1223 873800
Harlequin http://www.harlequin.com
-------------------------------------------------------------
If my views didn't usually coincide with those of my employer
I probably wouldn't work here, but I am not a spokesman for
Harlequin and the buck stops with me for what I say.
-------------------------------------------------------------