AWARE [SYSTEMS] Imaging expertise for the Delphi developer
AWare Systems, Imaging expertise for the Delphi developer, Home TIFF and LibTiff Mailing List Archive

LibTiff Mailing List

TIFF and LibTiff Mailing List Archive
October 2009

Previous Thread
Next Thread

Previous by Thread
Next by Thread

Previous by Date
Next by Date

Contact

The TIFF Mailing List Homepage
This list is run by Frank Warmerdam
Archive maintained by AWare Systems



Valid HTML 4.01!



2009.10.14 13:48 "Libtiff Tiff Tag TIFFTAG_STRIPBYTECOUNTS.", by Robert Zermeno

Everyone,
 
I hope someone can come up with a loop around for this.  So, I am trying to
programmatically open a Tiff file and read a segment of the image,
manipulate it, and spit it out into a new Tiff file.
 
My question is, my new Tiff file will have a size that is much smaller than
the original Tiff image.  I would like to define the TIFFTAG_STRIPBYTECOUNTS
count to the size of the new Tiff image height with its values being == to
Tiff image width.
 
My issues I experience is this.  Input Tiff image is of size 1001 x 901 and
Output Tiff image is say 300 x 300.  Now, when I perform the operation to
only select 300 x 300 pixels out of the 1001 x 901 pixels, the output Tiff
image STRIPBYTECOUNT count is == 901 with strip offsets always the value of
the new Image width - 100.  So, this case, the value is 200.  
 
This causes an issue because, I will not be able to see my photo I have
created programmatically.  Furthermore, you know that StripOffsets are
intertwined with StripByteCounts, so it too has a Count size of == 901 and
not 300.
 
Why did libtiff make it not possible for the user to do a
TIFFSetField(outTiff, TIFFTAG_STRIPBYTECOUNTS, ArrayByteCounts) or the same
for TIFFTAG_STRIPOFFSETS as well?  
 
It would be useful to override libtiff computation of these tags for user
specifics.  Does anyone know of a loop around to set these fields or maybe
have a possible solution to my issue?  If you must see my code, I can supply
it a little later on in the day.
 
Thanks to whomever that can enlighten me on this matter,
 
Robert