2008.08.29 22:53 "[Tiff] Some security fixes from RHEL", by Even Rouault

2008.09.04 08:05 "Re: [Tiff] Some security fixes from RHEL", by Tom Lane

On Wed, Sep 03, 2008 at 02:39:02PM -0700, Lee Howard wrote:

I understand, really, I do. Isn't the 3.8 to 3.9 indicator clear enough to show that things are changing?

There are new features such as sane OldJPEG support,

This is doubtless offtopic for this thread, but: I would be seriously curious to know what you think "sane OldJPEG support" is. The only reason that OldJPEG got abandoned in the first place is that it wasn't sane and couldn't be made so. I would personally prefer to reject outright any libtiff patch that tries to pretend OldJPEG is a good or even minimally supportable idea.

regards, tom lane