AWARE [SYSTEMS] Imaging expertise for the Delphi developer
AWare Systems, Imaging expertise for the Delphi developer, Home TIFF and LibTiff Mailing List Archive

LibTiff Mailing List

TIFF and LibTiff Mailing List Archive
January 2001

Previous Thread
Next Thread

Previous by Thread
Next by Thread

Previous by Date
Next by Date

Contact

The TIFF Mailing List Homepage
This list is run by Frank Warmerdam
Archive maintained by AWare Systems



Valid HTML 4.01!



Thread

2001.01.12 21:48 "What is the proper number of bytes in a TIFF 6.0 "word"", by Dave Abercrombie
2001.01.12 22:21 "Re: What is the proper number of bytes in a TIFF 6.0 "word"", by Helge Blischke
2001.01.12 22:52 "Re: What is the proper number of bytes in a TIFF 6.0 "word"", by Dave Abercrombie
2001.01.13 01:04 "Re: What is the proper number of bytes in a TIFF 6.0 "word"", by Tom Lane
2001.01.14 18:54 "Re: What is the proper number of bytes in a TIFF 6.0 "word"", by Andreas R Kleinert

2001.01.12 21:48 "What is the proper number of bytes in a TIFF 6.0 "word"", by Dave Abercrombie

The TIFF 6.0 spec uses the word "word" a little losely.  In the
description of an Image File Header, bytes 4-7 are an offset in bytes of

the first IFD, and then goes on to say that the IFD "must begin on a
word boundary". But there is no mention there of the size of a "word".

Shortly thereafter, in the description of an IFD, bytes 8-11 contain the

Value Offset. "The Value is expected to begin on a word boundary; the
corresponding Value Offset will thus be an even number."  I suppose this

answers the question, but if a "word" were four bytes long, it would
still be even.

If I'm not mistaken, a "word" was a dominant term in the days of the
16-bit architecture; and C had to make the distinction between a "short"

and a "long" (word).  Since TIFF 6.0 was finalized in 1992, I suppose
one could presume that words were predominantly two bytes at the time.

What is the consensus among the TIFF experts?

Regards,
Dave Abercrombie