AWARE [SYSTEMS] Imaging expertise for the Delphi developer
AWare Systems, Imaging expertise for the Delphi developer, Home TIFF and LibTiff Mailing List Archive

LibTiff Mailing List

TIFF and LibTiff Mailing List Archive
November 2006

Previous Thread
Next Thread

Previous by Thread
Next by Thread

Previous by Date
Next by Date

Contact

The TIFF Mailing List Homepage
This list is run by Frank Warmerdam
Archive maintained by AWare Systems



Valid HTML 4.01!



Thread

2006.11.24 10:23 "Windows HD Photo - any interest?", by Brad Hards
2006.11.24 16:02 "Re: Windows HD Photo - any interest?", by Andrey Kiselev
2006.11.24 21:53 "Re: Windows HD Photo - any interest?", by Brad Hards
2006.11.24 23:06 "Re: Windows HD Photo - any interest?", by Bob Friesenhahn
2006.11.25 01:53 "Re: Windows HD Photo - any interest?", by Brad Hards
2006.11.25 10:20 "Re: Windows HD Photo - any interest?", by Andrey Kiselev
2006.11.25 13:59 "Re: Windows HD Photo - any interest?", by Sachin Garg
2006.11.25 15:01 "Re: Windows HD Photo - any interest?", by Andrey Kiselev
2006.11.25 15:56 "Re: Windows HD Photo - any interest?", by Frank Warmerdam
2006.11.25 18:00 "Re: Windows HD Photo - any interest?", by Sachin Garg
2006.11.25 15:40 "Re: Windows HD Photo - any interest?", by Andrey Kiselev
2006.11.25 18:41 "Re: Windows HD Photo - any interest?", by Sachin Garg
2006.11.26 15:16 "Re: Windows HD Photo - any interest?", by Leonard Rosenthol
2006.11.26 19:59 "Re: Windows HD Photo - any interest?", by Brad Hards
2006.11.26 20:57 "Re: Windows HD Photo - any interest?", by Bob Friesenhahn

2006.11.25 18:00 "Re: Windows HD Photo - any interest?", by Sachin Garg

On 11/25/06, Frank Warmerdam wrote:
> Sachin Garg wrote:
> > Unless I have missed something, I think it should be possible to
> > include its support in libtiff, else libjpeg style approach can
> > ofcourse be used. (I am not a lawyer)
>
> I can't say that I have a good understanding of the HD Photo format.
> It seems to use TIFF style directories, but to maintain it's own
> complete set of baseline tags, making it ... not TIFF at all really.
>
> I'd suggest you experiment with support for it either in a working fork
> of libtiff or in something that can be layered on libtiff (in the way that
> geotiff is) for now.  Perhaps when we see what a minimum-disruption
> approach to supporting HD Photo would look like, we (the libtiff maintainers)
> would be more comfortable with it's incorporation in the core.
>
> Though I haven't dug deep, on the face of it I'm very offended that
> Microsoft has chosen to "do it's own thing" without regard to existing
> standards.  Like Andrey, I don't feel inclined to bend over backward to
> make up for their offense.
>
> Nevertheless, if you can be patient, perhaps you can bring us around and
> we can end up with a libtiff that supports their format smoothly, at
> least for reading.

To be honest, I myself don't know much about its internals and agree
with you that its not a good thing that its not entirely a tiff
extension like DNG, which I think follows the standard and is
supported by libtiff. (I wonder why they chose to do it this way,
maybe I should read the specifications first :-)

Sachin Garg [India]
www.sachingarg.com | www.c10n.info