AWARE [SYSTEMS] Imaging expertise for the Delphi developer
AWare Systems, Imaging expertise for the Delphi developer, Home TIFF and LibTiff Mailing List Archive

LibTiff Mailing List

TIFF and LibTiff Mailing List Archive
September 2006

Previous Thread
Next Thread

Previous by Thread
Next by Thread

Previous by Date
Next by Date

Contact

The TIFF Mailing List Homepage
This list is run by Frank Warmerdam
Archive maintained by AWare Systems



Valid HTML 4.01!



Thread

2006.09.22 01:07 "Status of ISO JBIG and CIELAB JPEG support", by A Wandering Libtiff User
2006.09.22 11:14 "Re: Status of ISO JBIG and CIELAB JPEG support", by Joris Van Damme
2006.09.25 17:08 "Re: Status of ISO JBIG and CIELAB JPEG support", by Joris Van Damme
2006.09.26 06:48 "Re: Status of ISO JBIG and CIELAB JPEG support", by A Wandering Libtiff User
2006.09.26 10:48 "Re: Status of ISO JBIG and CIELAB JPEG support", by Jean-yves Le Ridant
2006.09.26 11:56 "Re: Status of ISO JBIG and CIELAB JPEG support", by A Wandering Libtiff User
2006.09.26 12:50 "Re[2]: [Tiff] Status of ISO JBIG and CIELAB JPEG support", by Jean-yves Le Ridant
2006.09.26 17:53 "Re[2]: [Tiff] Status of ISO JBIG and CIELAB JPEG support", by Jean-yves Le Ridant
2006.09.26 21:20 "Re: Re[2]: [Tiff] Status of ISO JBIG and CIELAB JPEG support", by Chris Cox
2006.09.26 23:25 "Re: Status of ISO JBIG and CIELAB JPEG support", by Jean-yves Le Ridant
2006.09.26 14:02 "Re: Status of ISO JBIG and CIELAB JPEG support", by Joris Van Damme
2006.09.26 13:38 "Re: Status of ISO JBIG and CIELAB JPEG support", by Joris Van Damme
2006.09.27 06:13 "Re: Status of ISO JBIG and CIELAB JPEG support", by Graeme Gill
2006.09.27 12:38 "Re: Status of ISO JBIG and CIELAB JPEG support", by Joris Van Damme
2006.09.27 19:42 "Re: Status of ISO JBIG and CIELAB JPEG support", by A Wandering Libtiff User
2006.09.27 20:39 "Re: Status of ISO JBIG and CIELAB JPEG support", by Joris Van Damme
2006.09.28 18:39 "Re[2]: [Tiff] Status of ISO JBIG and CIELAB JPEG support", by Jean-yves Le Ridant
2006.09.29 08:30 "Re[2]: [Tiff] Status of ISO JBIG and CIELAB JPEG support", by Jean-yves Le Ridant
2006.09.29 12:50 "Re: Re[2]: [Tiff] Status of ISO JBIG and CIELAB JPEG support", by Joris Van Damme
2006.10.03 11:26 "Re[4]: [Tiff] Status of ISO JBIG and CIELAB JPEG support", by Jean-yves Le Ridant
2006.10.03 13:09 "Re: Status of ISO JBIG and CIELAB JPEG support", by Joris Van Damme
2006.10.19 12:56 "Re: Status of ISO JBIG and CIELAB JPEG support", by Leridant Jean-yves
2006.09.27 20:12 "Re: Status of ISO JBIG and CIELAB JPEG support", by A Wandering Libtiff User
2006.09.22 13:55 "Re: Status of ISO JBIG and CIELAB JPEG support", by Ed Grissom

2006.09.29 08:30 "Re[2]: [Tiff] Status of ISO JBIG and CIELAB JPEG support", by Jean-yves Le Ridant

> What you may be thinking of is that Yves double-checked the
> ITULAB-TIFF-in-discuise with Photometric CIE Lab, by taking it into
> Photoshop and next correcting Photoshop's wrong take on this caused by
> the wrong Photometric, with various dials and bells, such that the image
> would start making sense if it was ITULAB despite of its Photometric.
> And it did start making sense.

I apologize for my previous post which is confusing.
This file fax000... , with a white falling to 128,96
perfectly match what I read from the spec for both a and b layers.

Applying the transform with an imaging program is straightforward for a,
but for b, one need dials and bells with both input and output levels
to produce the exact transform, so what I uploaded ( qView.tif ) is
very approx.
;-)

--
Jean-Yves