AWARE [SYSTEMS] Imaging expertise for the Delphi developer
AWare Systems, Imaging expertise for the Delphi developer, Home TIFF and LibTiff Mailing List Archive

LibTiff Mailing List

TIFF and LibTiff Mailing List Archive
October 2000

Previous Thread
Next Thread

Previous by Thread
Next by Thread

Previous by Date
Next by Date

Contact

The TIFF Mailing List Homepage
This list is run by Frank Warmerdam
Archive maintained by AWare Systems



Valid HTML 4.01!



Thread

2000.10.09 10:24 "IFD / Image data ordering", by Brian Stafford
2000.10.10 03:22 "Re: IFD / Image data ordering", by Niles Ritter
2000.10.10 06:09 "Re: IFD / Image data ordering", by Tom Lane
2000.10.10 08:29 "Re: IFD / Image data ordering", by Martin Bailey
2000.10.10 08:41 "Re: IFD / Image data ordering", by Brian Stafford
2000.10.10 10:39 "Re: IFD / Image data ordering", by Andreas R Kleinert
2000.10.10 09:26 "Re: IFD / Image data ordering", by Brian Stafford

2000.10.10 08:29 "Re: IFD / Image data ordering", by Martin Bailey

At 07:09 10/10/00, Tom Lane wrote:
> Niles Ritter writes:
> > As I read the RFC 2301 spec, it looks like you have more than one
> > challenge, because not only does it say that the offsets SHALL be
> > written out with forward-only IFD pointers, but the byte-order of the
> > file SHALL be little-endian (Intel),
>
> Sheesh.  How did RFC 2301 get accepted?  Obviously they carefully
> refrained from allowing it to be reviewed by anyone with a clue
> about TIFF.

I believe that the intent was to bend TIFF into a form that could be read 
from a file that was not positionable.

Remember PostScript printers that could send and receive fax? I have a 
suspicion that TIFF/FX was part of that work.




Regards

Martin Bailey

-------------------------------------------------------------
   Senior Technical Consultant  mailto:martinb@harlequin.com
   Digital Print & Publishing                +44 1223 873800
   Harlequin                        http://www.harlequin.com
-------------------------------------------------------------
If my views didn't usually coincide with those of my employer
  I wouldn't want to work here, but I am not a spokesman for
      Harlequin and the buck stops with me for what I say.
-------------------------------------------------------------