AWARE [SYSTEMS] Imaging expertise for the Delphi developer
AWare Systems, Imaging expertise for the Delphi developer, Home TIFF and LibTiff Mailing List Archive

LibTiff Mailing List

TIFF and LibTiff Mailing List Archive
June 2010

Previous Thread
Next Thread

Previous by Thread
Next by Thread

Previous by Date
Next by Date

Contact

The TIFF Mailing List Homepage
This list is run by Frank Warmerdam
Archive maintained by AWare Systems



Valid HTML 4.01!



Thread

2010.06.23 16:16 "LZMA2 codec for libtiff", by Andrey Kiselev
2010.06.23 16:43 "Re: LZMA2 codec for libtiff", by Scott Ribe
2010.06.23 17:14 "Re: LZMA2 codec for libtiff", by Bob Friesenhahn
2010.06.24 15:01 "Re: LZMA2 codec for libtiff", by Andrey Kiselev
2010.06.24 15:54 "Re: LZMA2 codec for libtiff", by Bob Friesenhahn
2010.06.25 10:09 "Re: LZMA2 codec for libtiff", by Andrey Kiselev
2010.06.25 02:26 "Re: LZMA2 codec for libtiff", by Scott Ribe

2010.06.24 15:01 "Re: LZMA2 codec for libtiff", by Andrey Kiselev

On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 10:43:35AM -0600, Scott Ribe wrote:
> > Compression is better than the one with Defalte codec
> > for almost all data files I've tried. Sometimes it is MUCH better.
> 
> You might play with bzip. Same advantages re open implementation and
> patent-free. In my (very limited) tests, compression was only slightly worse
> than lzma, and performance was much better.

On my typical data it is much worse than LZMA. Actually I do not see a reason
to use it because of worse compression ratios. I am talking about libtiff usage
here, of course bzip2 utility is widely adopted as a general purpose
compressor and LZMA stuff is not on par here.

If we want to bring some new codec in libtiff world we need something that has
clear advantage over the existing ones, either compression ratio or something
other (decomression speed, like Bob mentioned).

Best regards,
Andrey

-- 
Andrey V. Kiselev