AWARE [SYSTEMS] Imaging expertise for the Delphi developer
AWare Systems, Imaging expertise for the Delphi developer, Home TIFF and LibTiff Mailing List Archive

LibTiff Mailing List

TIFF and LibTiff Mailing List Archive
June 2010

Previous Thread
Next Thread

Previous by Thread
Next by Thread

Previous by Date
Next by Date

Contact

The TIFF Mailing List Homepage
This list is run by Frank Warmerdam
Archive maintained by AWare Systems



Valid HTML 4.01!



Thread

2010.06.23 16:16 "LZMA2 codec for libtiff", by Andrey Kiselev
2010.06.23 16:43 "Re: LZMA2 codec for libtiff", by Scott Ribe
2010.06.23 17:14 "Re: LZMA2 codec for libtiff", by Bob Friesenhahn
2010.06.24 15:01 "Re: LZMA2 codec for libtiff", by Andrey Kiselev
2010.06.24 15:54 "Re: LZMA2 codec for libtiff", by Bob Friesenhahn
2010.06.25 10:09 "Re: LZMA2 codec for libtiff", by Andrey Kiselev
2010.06.25 02:26 "Re: LZMA2 codec for libtiff", by Scott Ribe

2010.06.25 10:09 "Re: LZMA2 codec for libtiff", by Andrey Kiselev

On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 10:54:57AM -0500, Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
>> On my typical data it is much worse than LZMA. Actually I do not see a reason
>> to use it because of worse compression ratios. I am talking about libtiff usage
>> here, of course bzip2 utility is widely adopted as a general purpose
>> compressor and LZMA stuff is not on par here.
>
> When you compared LZMA with bzip2, did you do it by compressing whole  
> image files?  What type of images are you testing with?
>
> ImageMagick and GraphicsMagick support bzip2 compression in the "MIFF"  
> file format.  Compression is done on a per-row basis without any  
> modification via a 'predictor'.  This makes it a good test case for  
> bzip2 compression.

I've compressed the raw raster image, pixel interleaved. And I've used the
delta filter supported by LZMA codec. Without the data preparation results are
not such impressive, yes.

Best regards,
Andrey

-- 
Andrey V. Kiselev