2002.08.20 07:31 "memory allocation", by Peter Majer
-
2002.08.20 16:13 "RE: memory allocation", by Roger Bedell
-
2002.08.20 20:48 "OT: large memory allocation in Windows", by Dante Allegria
-
2002.08.21 08:34 "Re: OT: large memory allocation in Windows", by Rob van den Tillaart
-
2002.08.21 11:30 "Re: OT: large memory allocation in Windows", by Peter Majer
-
2002.08.21 13:47 "Re: OT: large memory allocation in Windows", by Rob van den Tillaart
- 2002.08.21 16:05 "Re: OT: large memory allocation in Windows", by Bob Friesenhahn
-
2002.08.21 20:47 "Re: OT: large memory allocation in Windows", by Peter Nielsen
-
2002.08.22 08:33 "Re: OT: large memory allocation in Windows", by Andreas R. Kleinert
-
2002.08.22 15:30 "RE: OT: large memory allocation in Windows", by Roger Bedell
-
2002.08.22 16:29 "Re: OT: large memory allocation in Windows", by Chris 'Xenon' Hanson
- 2002.08.22 17:20 "RE: OT: large memory allocation in Windows", by Roger Bedell
- 2002.08.22 17:33 "Re: OT: large memory allocation in Windows", by Peter Montgomery
-
2002.08.22 16:29 "Re: OT: large memory allocation in Windows", by Chris 'Xenon' Hanson
- 2002.08.22 15:59 "RE: OT: large memory allocation in Windows", by Ed Grissom
-
2002.08.22 15:30 "RE: OT: large memory allocation in Windows", by Roger Bedell
-
2002.08.22 08:33 "Re: OT: large memory allocation in Windows", by Andreas R. Kleinert
-
2002.08.21 13:47 "Re: OT: large memory allocation in Windows", by Rob van den Tillaart
- 2002.08.21 11:48 "Re: OT: large memory allocation in Windows", by Peter Nielsen
-
2002.08.21 11:30 "Re: OT: large memory allocation in Windows", by Peter Majer
- 2002.08.22 18:00 "Re: OT: large memory allocation in Windows", by Bob Friesenhahn
-
2002.08.21 08:34 "Re: OT: large memory allocation in Windows", by Rob van den Tillaart
-
2002.08.20 20:48 "OT: large memory allocation in Windows", by Dante Allegria
2002.08.21 08:34 "Re: OT: large memory allocation in Windows", by Rob van den Tillaart
Awful problem,
- stop all services not needed
- try to allocate memory before starting anything else
- a last (awful) solution is to write a memory-class, which maps chunks of memory on some virtual contiguous memory. (looks a hell of a job to me). Memory allocated by this class could only be accessed through this class, not by pointer aritmatic like "x = *p + 35".
regards,
rob