AWARE [SYSTEMS] Imaging expertise for the Delphi developer
AWare Systems, Imaging expertise for the Delphi developer, Home TIFF and LibTiff Mailing List Archive

LibTiff Mailing List

TIFF and LibTiff Mailing List Archive
April 1994

Previous Thread
Next Thread

Previous by Thread
Next by Thread

Previous by Date
Next by Date

Contact

The TIFF Mailing List Homepage
This list is run by Frank Warmerdam
Archive maintained by AWare Systems



Valid HTML 4.01!



Thread

1994.04.19 20:54 "TIFF Tags for remote-sensing", by Randolf Gladish
1994.04.22 09:03 "Re: TIFF Tags for remote-sensing", by Karsten Spang
1994.04.22 13:10 "Re: TIFF Tags for remote-sensing", by Francois Gauthier

1994.04.22 13:10 "Re: TIFF Tags for remote-sensing", by Francois Gauthier

> Cc: tiff@sgi.com, krs@kampsax.dk
> Date: Fri, 22 Apr 94 11:03:24 +0200
> From: "Karsten Spang" <krs@kampsax.dk>
> X-Mts: smtp
> X-Charset: ASCII
> X-Char-Esc: 29
> Sender: tiff-owner@sgi.com
> 
> >I was wondering if there has been any work regarding the use of TIFF
> >to store multispectral data sets. Most TIFF implementations place severe
> >(for MS data) restrictions on the number of samples per pixel (bands)
> >usually 3 or 4. This is completely inadequate for remote-sensing.
> 
> In principle there is no restriction on the number of samples in a TIFF
> image. All the samples must have the same resolution, though. (I seem to
> recall that the far infrared band of Landsat only has half the resolution
> of the rest)
> 
> The main problem is that there is no suitable value for the photometric
> interpretaion tag. I suggest that you contact Aldus and request that a 
> new value "Multispectral" is included in the next version. Alternatively,
> you may want a private value. The tag has no default value, nor is it a
> "required" field, thus you may simply omit it. This is "right" in the
> sense, that multispectral data have no real colors per se, only when
> you assign colors to the bands, the picture comes out in (false) colors.
> 
>                                Karsten
> 
> P.S. (just speculating) New values of the resolution unit tag may be also
> beneficial to remote sensing applications, including pixels per meter
> and pixels per kilometer. You may also want new tags for describing the
> geographical area depicted, wavelenght intervals for each sample, ...
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> E-mail: krs@kampsax.dk                                      Karsten Spang
> Phone:  +45 36 77 22 23                                     Kampsax Data
> Fax:    +45 36 77 03 01                                     P.O. Box 1142

	A perhaps simpler alternative would be to use a subimage for each
	or for smaller subsets of spectral bands.

	This approach would enable the TIFF reader to read spectral bands
	selectively. This is usually more efficient unless your application
	requires that all spectral information be in core memory at all
	times. If so, then it makes no difference how the image(s) is/are
	stored in the TIFF file.

	Since subimages can have different resolution (they have separate
	directories), this should be ideal for Landsat images.

	The only inconvenience is that TIFF readers such as xv can only
	read the first subimage. Getting access to the other subimages is
	not difficult and may eventually be supported in later releases of
	xv. I must caution though that I have absolutely no knowledge of
	this happening anytime soon.  

	Hope this helps

	Francois Gauthier

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Francois Gauthier				(514) 928-4600 Ext.: 599
M3i Systems, Longueuil Quebec
e-mail: fgauth@m3isystems.qc.ca or francois@cim.mcgill.ca
Disclaimer: All opinions my own.