AWARE [SYSTEMS] Imaging expertise for the Delphi developer
AWare Systems, Imaging expertise for the Delphi developer, Home TIFF and LibTiff Mailing List Archive

LibTiff Mailing List

TIFF and LibTiff Mailing List Archive
February 2001

Previous Thread
Next Thread

Previous by Thread
Next by Thread

Previous by Date
Next by Date

Contact

The TIFF Mailing List Homepage
This list is run by Frank Warmerdam
Archive maintained by AWare Systems



Valid HTML 4.01!



Thread

2001.02.21 18:05 "PhotoShop alpha channels and LibTiff", by Chris Losinger
2001.02.21 19:22 "Re: PhotoShop alpha channels and LibTiff", by Michael O'rourke
2001.02.21 19:44 "Re: PhotoShop alpha channels and LibTiff", by Chris Losinger
2001.02.22 00:39 "Re: PhotoShop alpha channels and LibTiff", by Joris Van Damme
2001.02.22 14:36 "Re: PhotoShop alpha channels and LibTiff", by Ricardo Lopez
2001.02.21 19:57 "Re: PhotoShop alpha channels and LibTiff", by Chris Hanson

2001.02.22 00:39 "Re: PhotoShop alpha channels and LibTiff", by Joris Van Damme

Chris Losinger wrote:
> 
> any idea why?
> 
> this seems like a terribly cruel thing to do. 

I'm not an adobe employee or something, but I can make a guess here, if
that's OK.

Photoshop's PSD file format allows for a number of layers, alpha
channels, etc. In such a sceme, there is no such thing as a single alpha
channel, but only a number of channels, some of which represent colors
in layers, or in a global picture, others alpha's that can have just
about any local layers or global image meaning and must even considered
to be editable and enablable/disablable by users all the time. I guess
this makes adobe reluctant to define such a thing as a single alpha
channel, including when they write out other formats that allow for
something else/more than a single alpha.

Also, it might be a bit of a strategic move. (Mind you, I do say 'it
might', I don't actually know anything.) I mean, TIFF certainly has the
potential to store just about everything a PSD can store. But TIFF's
weak point is the spec doesn't reflect the last generation of image
editors and in general if image usage anymore. This TIFF spec and
updating it is the responsability of... adobe, and, now now now, the
lack of agreement on such topics as multiple alpha's, layers, etc... is
becoming a tiff problem...

> is there any work-around ?

You can't possibly, in my opinion, consider adding a meaning that
doesn't even reflect anything definable by the intentional writer. So
the only possible thing to do is treat the image the same way. I
strongly suspect adobe adds proprietary data that describes the intended
meaning of the channels in detail, or at least offers the user the
option to have this done. That is, if my assumptions are correct. I'd
expect photoshop is probably given the information to read as much back
as possible, so if there is any intrest in reading photoshop tiffs, I'd
recommend downloading the adobe sdk, which includes pdf's describing
lots of adobe format stuff.



Joris