AWARE [SYSTEMS] Imaging expertise for the Delphi developer
AWare Systems, Imaging expertise for the Delphi developer, Home TIFF and LibTiff Mailing List Archive

LibTiff Mailing List

TIFF and LibTiff Mailing List Archive
June 2010

Previous Thread
Next Thread

Previous by Thread
Next by Thread

Previous by Date
Next by Date

Contact

The TIFF Mailing List Homepage
This list is run by Frank Warmerdam
Archive maintained by AWare Systems



Valid HTML 4.01!



Thread

2010.06.17 15:39 "libtiff 4 API/ABI stability?", by Adam Goode
2010.06.17 16:21 "Re: libtiff 4 API/ABI stability?", by Edward Lam
2010.06.17 16:22 "Re: libtiff 4 API/ABI stability?", by Edward Lam
2010.06.17 16:38 "Re: libtiff 4 API/ABI stability?", by Adam Goode
2010.06.17 22:06 "Re: libtiff 4 API/ABI stability?", by Edward Lam
2010.06.18 00:13 "Re: libtiff 4 API/ABI stability?", by Adam Goode
2010.06.18 13:44 "Re: libtiff 4 API/ABI stability?", by Edward Lam
2010.06.18 17:46 "[PATCH] Build tif_win32.c on Windows except on Cygwin", by Adam Goode
2010.06.18 18:21 "Re: [PATCH] Build tif_win32.c on Windows except on Cygwin", by Bob Friesenhahn
2010.06.18 18:32 "Re: [PATCH] Build tif_win32.c on Windows except on Cygwin", by Adam Goode
2010.06.18 18:35 "Re: [PATCH] Build tif_win32.c on Windows except on Cygwin", by Adam Goode
2010.06.28 13:25 "Re: [PATCH] Build tif_win32.c on Windows except on Cygwin", by Edward Lam
2010.06.28 15:54 "Re: [PATCH] Build tif_win32.c on Windows except on Cygwin", by Bob Friesenhahn
2010.06.29 11:23 "Re: [PATCH] Build tif_win32.c on Windows except on Cygwin", by Andrey Kiselev
2010.06.29 13:46 "Re: [PATCH] Build tif_win32.c on Windows except on Cygwin", by Adam Goode
2010.06.17 16:28 "Re: libtiff 4 API/ABI stability?", by Bob Friesenhahn
2010.06.17 16:34 "Re: libtiff 4 API/ABI stability?", by Adam Goode
2010.06.17 16:55 "Re: libtiff 4 API/ABI stability?", by Bob Friesenhahn
2010.06.17 17:15 "Re: libtiff 4 API/ABI stability?", by Adam Goode
2010.06.17 18:04 "Re: libtiff 4 API/ABI stability?", by Olivier Paquet
2010.06.17 18:09 "Re: libtiff 4 API/ABI stability?", by Adam Goode
2010.06.17 18:47 "Re: libtiff 4 API/ABI stability?", by Bob Friesenhahn
2010.06.17 19:35 "Re: libtiff 4 API/ABI stability?", by Olivier Paquet
2010.06.18 00:33 "Re: libtiff 4 API/ABI stability?", by Adam Goode
2010.06.18 01:45 "Re: libtiff 4 API/ABI stability?", by Adam Goode
2010.06.18 01:54 "Re: libtiff 4 API/ABI stability?", by Olivier Paquet
2010.06.18 02:00 "Re: libtiff 4 API/ABI stability?", by Adam Goode
2010.06.18 13:32 "Re: libtiff 4 API/ABI stability?", by Edward Lam
2010.06.18 13:54 "Re: libtiff 4 API/ABI stability?", by Olivier Paquet
2010.06.18 02:36 "Re: libtiff 4 API/ABI stability?", by Bob Friesenhahn
2010.06.17 20:14 "Re: libtiff 4 API/ABI stability?", by Tom Lane
2010.06.17 20:35 "Re: libtiff 4 API/ABI stability?", by Bob Friesenhahn
2010.06.18 00:31 "Re: libtiff 4 API/ABI stability?", by Adam Goode

2010.06.18 00:33 "Re: libtiff 4 API/ABI stability?", by Adam Goode

On 06/17/2010 03:35 PM, Olivier Paquet wrote:
> 
> Yes, TSD is probably the only thing that really scales. The downside
> is that it means we have to link with libpthread on linux. I'm not
> sure if that kind of change can safely be made once 4.0 is released so
> now might be a good time, even if we don't actually use libpthread
> yet.

You don't need TSD to scale. Just have mostly immutable structures that
you lock when you write to or pass to a different thread. Then
everything can work fine.

I'm pretty sure that if libtiff needs to compile with -pthread then we
are doing something wrong.


Adam