AWARE [SYSTEMS] Imaging expertise for the Delphi developer
AWare Systems, Imaging expertise for the Delphi developer, Home TIFF and LibTiff Mailing List Archive

LibTiff Mailing List

TIFF and LibTiff Mailing List Archive
July 2010

Previous Thread
Next Thread

Previous by Thread
Next by Thread

Previous by Date
Next by Date

Contact

The TIFF Mailing List Homepage
This list is run by Frank Warmerdam
Archive maintained by AWare Systems



Valid HTML 4.01!



Thread

2010.07.08 16:25 "strlcpy vs strncpy", by Bob Friesenhahn
2010.07.08 18:03 "Re: strlcpy vs strncpy", by Lee Howard
2010.07.08 18:06 "Re: strlcpy vs strncpy", by Olivier Paquet
2010.07.11 17:36 "Re: strlcpy vs strncpy", by Edward Lam
2010.07.12 19:30 "strncpy in tiffcrop", by Richard Nolde
2010.07.12 20:31 "Re: strncpy in tiffcrop", by Edward Lam
2010.07.10 11:04 "Re: strlcpy vs strncpy", by Albert Cahalan
2010.07.10 13:27 "Re: strlcpy vs strncpy", by Kevin Myers
2010.07.10 13:50 "Re: strlcpy vs strncpy", by Bob Friesenhahn
2010.07.11 07:34 "Re: strlcpy vs strncpy", by Albert Cahalan
2010.07.11 08:06 "Re: strlcpy vs strncpy", by Toby Thain
2010.07.11 14:35 "Re: strlcpy vs strncpy", by Bob Friesenhahn
2010.07.10 13:39 "Re: strlcpy vs strncpy", by Bob Friesenhahn
2010.07.11 08:18 "Re: strlcpy vs strncpy", by Albert Cahalan
2010.07.11 16:35 "Re: strlcpy vs strncpy", by Bob Friesenhahn
2010.07.12 17:34 "Re: strlcpy vs strncpy", by Dmitry V Levin
2010.07.12 18:13 "Re: strlcpy vs strncpy", by Bob Friesenhahn

2010.07.08 18:03 "Re: strlcpy vs strncpy", by Lee Howard

Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
> I see that libtiff is using strncpy() as a safer strcpy() and 
> strncat() as a safer strcat().  Unfortunately, strncpy() does include 
> a significant design flaw which causes it still to be insecure unless 
> additional care is taken.  The problem occurs when the string to be 
> copied exactly matches the buffer size, in which case the string will 
> lack null termination.  The strlcpy() (and strlcat) functions avoid 
> this glitch by always assuring null termination.  The return value of 
> strl*() are also much more useful since it is easy to test if the 
> string was truncated (and by how much).
>
> GraphicsMagick is using strlcpy() and strlcat() for secure string 
> copies.  I will be happy to contribute versions that I wrote myself 
> for use in libtiff if libtiff choses to rely on these more secure 
> functions.  Libtiff should name the replacement functions differently 
> in order to avoid any possible conflict/confusion with system provided 
> versions, or versions from some dependent library or program.

I don't have any arguments against this.

Thanks,

Lee.