2017.02.06 20:43 "[Tiff] Qs about support for more than 2^16 IFDs and writing performance", by Dinesh Iyer
- 2017.02.06 23:59 "Re: [Tiff] Qs about support for more than 2^16 IFDs and writing performance", by Paavo Helde
-
2017.02.07 00:04 "Re: [Tiff] Qs about support for more than 2^16 IFDs and writing performance", by Bob Friesenhahn
-
2017.02.07 00:40 "Re: [Tiff] Qs about support for more than 2^16 IFDs and writing performance", by Paavo Helde
-
2017.02.07 00:58 "Re: [Tiff] Qs about support for more than 2^16 IFDs and writing performance", by Bob Friesenhahn
-
2017.02.07 16:16 "Re: [Tiff] Qs about support for more than 2^16 IFDs and writing performance", by Dinesh Iyer
-
2017.02.07 17:36 "Re: [Tiff] Qs about support for more than 2^16 IFDs and writing performance", by Dinesh Iyer
- 2017.02.07 17:36 "Re: [Tiff] Qs about support for more than 2^16 IFDs and writing performance", by Dinesh Iyer
-
2017.02.07 20:01 "Re: [Tiff] Qs about support for more than 2^16 IFDs and writing performance", by Olivier Paquet
- 2017.02.07 20:12 "Re: [Tiff] Qs about support for more than 2^16 IFDs and writing performance", by Bob Friesenhahn
-
2017.02.07 17:36 "Re: [Tiff] Qs about support for more than 2^16 IFDs and writing performance", by Dinesh Iyer
-
2017.02.07 16:16 "Re: [Tiff] Qs about support for more than 2^16 IFDs and writing performance", by Dinesh Iyer
-
2017.02.07 00:58 "Re: [Tiff] Qs about support for more than 2^16 IFDs and writing performance", by Bob Friesenhahn
- 2017.02.07 00:42 "Re: [Tiff] Qs about support for more than 2^16 IFDs and writing performance", by AG
-
2017.02.07 00:40 "Re: [Tiff] Qs about support for more than 2^16 IFDs and writing performance", by Paavo Helde
2017.02.07 00:42 "Re: [Tiff] Qs about support for more than 2^16 IFDs and writing performance", by AG
> On Feb 6, 2017, at 4:04 PM, Bob Friesenhahn <bfriesen@simple.dallas.tx.us> wrote:
The linear scan is perhaps not the fastest algorithm but it should not take terribly long (much less than a second) to scan 65535 entries.
If you need to extract a single image the linear scan is not a major problem. If however you need to extract more images, your linear scan becomes O(N^2) which in my experience becomes prohibitively expensive for large stacks.
It would also be good if the 65535 limit is removed but I have not yet received any customer complaints about that.
A.G.