-
2004.11.18 19:40 "Re: [Tiff] Using TIFFGetField to get a "Rational"", by Ulf Zibis
-
2004.11.18 19:55 "Re: [Tiff] Using TIFFGetField to get a "Rational"", by Joris Van Damme
-
2004.11.18 20:16 "Re: [Tiff] Using TIFFGetField to get a "Rational"", by Eric Vergnaud
-
2004.11.18 22:30 "Re: [Tiff] Using TIFFGetField to get a "Rational"", by Joris Van Damme
-
2004.11.19 00:17 "Re: [Tiff] Using TIFFGetField to get a "Rational"", by Eric Vergnaud
- 2004.11.19 00:35 "Re: [Tiff] Using TIFFGetField to get a "Rational"", by Bob Friesenhahn
- 2004.11.19 00:42 "Re: [Tiff] Using TIFFGetField to get a "Rational"", by Joris Van Damme
- 2004.11.23 20:35 "Re: [Tiff] Using TIFFGetField to get a "Rational"", by Andrey Kiselev
- 2004.11.19 17:29 "Re: [Tiff] Using TIFFGetField to get a "Rational"", by Ulf Zibis
-
2004.11.19 00:17 "Re: [Tiff] Using TIFFGetField to get a "Rational"", by Eric Vergnaud
-
2004.11.18 22:30 "Re: [Tiff] Using TIFFGetField to get a "Rational"", by Joris Van Damme
-
2004.11.18 20:16 "Re: [Tiff] Using TIFFGetField to get a "Rational"", by Eric Vergnaud
-
2004.11.18 19:55 "Re: [Tiff] Using TIFFGetField to get a "Rational"", by Joris Van Damme
- 2004.11.18 19:48 "Re: [Tiff] Using TIFFGetField to get a "Rational"", by Joris Van Damme
- 2004.11.23 14:58 "[Tiff] Using TIFFGetField to get a "Rational"", by Frank Warmerdam
- 2004.11.23 20:34 "Re: [Tiff] Using TIFFGetField to get a "Rational"", by Andrey Kiselev
2004.11.19 21:26 "Re: [Tiff] Using TIFFGetField to get a "Rational"", by Joris Van Damme
>> le 18/11/04 23:30, Joris à joris.at.lebbeke@skynet.be a écrit:
>>
>> Which makes me wonder why the [Tiff] mail server doesn't automatically add
>> the reply-to field, so we don't have to think about it.
Bob,
It is the second time that you wrongfully attribute that quote to me. I can see how that came about, though, it's because of the confusion that arose from the hole in the public converstation, due to people inadvertedly sending mail privately. That, in turn, was because the default reply-to address... well, you know.
I left this discussion a while ago, and I'm not returning to it - I don't feel like discussing the same thing over and over again with the only person who dissagrees but does not bother to answer simple enough questions like the ones in http://www.asmail.be/msg0054669513.html. But I would like to insist to please get your quote attribution straight. I agree with the quoted opinion, but it is not I who wrote it.
Joris Van Damme
info@awaresystems.be
http://www.awaresystems.be
Download your free TIFF tag viewer for windows here:
http://www.awaresystems.be/imaging/tiff/astifftagviewer.html