AWARE [SYSTEMS] Imaging expertise for the Delphi developer
AWare Systems, Imaging expertise for the Delphi developer, Home TIFF and LibTiff Mailing List Archive

LibTiff Mailing List

TIFF and LibTiff Mailing List Archive
February 2010

Previous Thread
Next Thread

Previous by Thread
Next by Thread

Previous by Date
Next by Date

Contact

The TIFF Mailing List Homepage
This list is run by Frank Warmerdam
Archive maintained by AWare Systems



Valid HTML 4.01!



Thread

2010.02.22 14:54 "Re: Libtiff 4.0.0beta5 Released", by Edward Lam
2010.02.22 15:13 "Re: Libtiff 4.0.0beta5 Released", by Andrew Brooks
2010.02.22 15:40 "Re: Libtiff 4.0.0beta5 Released", by Frank Warmerdam
2010.02.22 15:57 "Re: Libtiff 4.0.0beta5 Released", by Lee Howard
2010.02.22 16:15 "Re: Libtiff 4.0.0beta5 Released", by Frank Warmerdam
2010.02.22 17:45 "Re: Libtiff 4.0.0beta5 Released", by Lee Howard
2010.02.22 18:29 "Re: Libtiff 4.0.0beta5 Released", by Frank Warmerdam
2010.02.22 19:41 "Re: Libtiff 4.0.0beta5 Released", by Lee Howard
2010.02.22 19:58 "Re: Libtiff 4.0.0beta5 Released", by Frank Warmerdam
2010.02.22 20:35 "Re: Libtiff 4.0.0beta5 Released", by Bob Friesenhahn
2010.02.22 21:34 "Re: Libtiff 4.0.0beta5 Released", by Edward Lam
2010.02.22 20:30 "Re: Libtiff 4.0.0beta5 Released", by Bob Friesenhahn
2010.02.22 21:16 "Re: Libtiff 4.0.0beta5 Released", by Lee Howard
2010.02.22 18:10 "Re: Libtiff 4.0.0beta5 Released", by Edward Lam
2010.02.22 16:17 "Re: Libtiff 4.0.0beta5 Released", by Bob Friesenhahn
2010.02.22 16:37 "Re: Libtiff 4.0.0beta5 Released", by Edward Lam
2010.02.27 15:42 "Re: Libtiff 4.0.0beta5 Released", by Jay Berkenbilt
2010.02.27 18:57 "Re: Libtiff 4.0.0beta5 Released", by Lee Howard

2010.02.22 21:34 "Re: Libtiff 4.0.0beta5 Released", by Edward Lam

Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
> I don't see a real difference between release candidates or betas. 
> Betas are all release candidates.

Release candidates tend to make more sense with commercial software. In 
absence of that, I'll go with it as "We will not fix anything in a 
release candidate unless it is a crash that will impact most people". I 
guess that presumes that you also thought of a beta as "we will still 
add patches that people believe should be added before release". :)

With that definition, I'd agree with Lee that we should just move to a 
"release candidate". We've gone through 5 betas already and it's 
unlikely that someone new will come along and test a beta6 if they 
haven't already tested the betas. The added bonus of changing the name 
to "release candidate" is that it gives yet another signal that "Ok, 
we're *actually* going to release this time." :)

Cheers,
-Edward