AWARE [SYSTEMS] Imaging expertise for the Delphi developer
AWare Systems, Imaging expertise for the Delphi developer, Home TIFF and LibTiff Mailing List Archive

LibTiff Mailing List

TIFF and LibTiff Mailing List Archive
November 1999

Previous Thread
Next Thread

Previous by Thread
Next by Thread

Previous by Date
Next by Date

Contact

The TIFF Mailing List Homepage
This list is run by Frank Warmerdam
Archive maintained by AWare Systems



Valid HTML 4.01!



Thread

1999.11.30 22:23 "libtiff 3.5.3 release.", by Michael L Welles
1999.11.30 22:53 "Re: libtiff 3.5.3 release.", by Izumi Ohzawa
1999.11.30 23:07 "Re: libtiff 3.5.3 release.", by Tom Lane
1999.12.01 00:08 "Re: libtiff 3.5.3 release.", by Michael L Welles
1999.11.30 23:22 "Re: libtiff 3.5.3 release.", by Daniel Mccoy
1999.12.01 13:56 "Re: libtiff 3.5.3 release.", by Bruce Cameron
1999.12.01 18:35 "Re: libtiff 3.5.3 release.", by Daniel Mccoy
1999.12.02 07:06 "", by <lincke@de.ibm.com>
1999.12.01 03:15 "Re: libtiff 3.5.3 release.", by Bob Friesenhahn
1999.12.01 16:04 "Re: libtiff 3.5.3 release.", by Michael L Welles
1999.11.30 23:07 "Re: libtiff 3.5.3 release.", by Martin Bailey
1999.12.01 14:08 "Re: libtiff 3.5.3 release.", by Bruce Cameron
1999.12.01 15:02 "Re: libtiff 3.5.3 release.", by Klaus Bartz
1999.12.01 14:33 "Re: libtiff 3.5.3 release.", by <apex@calpha.com>
1999.12.01 14:42 "ZIP compression [was: libtiff 3.5.3 release.]", by Tom Kacvinsky
1999.12.01 15:24 "Re: ZIP compression [was: libtiff 3.5.3 release.]", by Leonard Rosenthol
1999.12.01 15:51 "Re: ZIP compression [was: libtiff 3.5.3 release.]", by Tom Kacvinsky
1999.12.01 18:04 "Re: ZIP compression [was: libtiff 3.5.3 release.]", by Bryan H Maret
1999.12.02 05:16 "Re: ZIP compression [was: libtiff 3.5.3 release.]", by Leonard Rosenthol
1999.12.01 17:39 "Re: ZIP compression [was: libtiff 3.5.3 release.]", by Bryan H Maret
1999.12.02 11:42 "Re: ZIP compression [was: libtiff 3.5.3 release.]", by Ivo Penzar
1999.12.06 20:42 "Re: ZIP compression [was: libtiff 3.5.3 release.]", by <apex@calpha.com>
1999.12.01 16:17 "Re: libtiff 3.5.3 release.", by Peter Smith
1999.12.01 16:43 "Re: libtiff 3.5.3 release.", by Tom Lane
1999.12.01 16:49 "Re: libtiff 3.5.3 release.", by Darrin Cardani
1999.12.01 19:20 "Re: libtiff 3.5.3 release.", by Chris Hanson

1999.12.01 00:08 "Re: libtiff 3.5.3 release.", by Michael L Welles

Richard Stallman informed Frank and I that the FSF's lawyers see LZW
compression as encumbered by the patent: 

>    My understanding is that LZW decompression is not encumbered by the LZW
>    patent, but that LZW compression is.  Do you know if that is true?
>
> That is how our lawyers read the patent, and so that is what we
> base our actions on.

Tom Lane writes:
 > Izumi Ohzawa <izumi@pinoko.berkeley.edu> writes:
 > > Now, I need a solid reference that LZW decompression is not
 > > covered by the LZW patent.  Nothing I have read, except for opinions
 > > or second-hand quotes at various forums, clearly indicates
 > > that decompression is not part of the patent.
 > 
 > > Especially, does anyone have written views from the Unisys itself
 > > on this?
 > 
 > Unisys' view is perfectly clear: they claim that decompression-only
 > software *is* covered by the patent.  (They have a webpage giving their
 > version of reality at www.unisys.com, check there for an exact quote.)
 > 
 > There are a number of qualified people who think that Unisys'
 > interpretation wouldn't hold up in court, and that a court would say
 > that decompression-only software isn't covered.  But AFAIK there's
 > been no test case to find out.  Do you want to be the test case?
 > 
 > > Regardless of what court may or may not rule in the end, that
 > > doesn't matter.  Most of us here, I think, just don't want to
 > > hear from Unisys counsels, ever.
 > 
 > Yup.  That's why I'm not shipping either LZW compression or
 > decompression code in libjpeg these days.  It was a relatively painless
 > decision for me, because GIF-reading was never a critical part of
 > libjpeg, but I can see that dropping the LZW decompressor would be
 > crippling for libtiff :-(.  Don't have any good advice...
 > 
 >                      regards, tom lane
 >                      organizer, Independent JPEG Group
 > 

------------------------------------------------------          
M. L.  Welles                   mike@onShore.com
-------------------------------------------------------