AWARE [SYSTEMS] Imaging expertise for the Delphi developer
AWare Systems, Imaging expertise for the Delphi developer, Home TIFF and LibTiff Mailing List Archive

LibTiff Mailing List

TIFF and LibTiff Mailing List Archive
March 2002

Previous Thread
Next Thread

Previous by Thread
Next by Thread

Previous by Date
Next by Date

Contact

The TIFF Mailing List Homepage
This list is run by Frank Warmerdam
Archive maintained by AWare Systems



Valid HTML 4.01!



Thread

2002.03.05 02:20 "16 bit LAB in TIFF - documentation update", by Chris Cox
2002.03.05 13:05 "Re: 16 bit LAB in TIFF - documentation update", by Marti Maria
2002.03.05 20:31 "Re: 16 bit LAB in TIFF - documentation update", by Chris Cox
2002.03.05 15:38 "Re: 16 bit LAB in TIFF - documentation update", by Martin Bailey
2002.03.05 20:31 "Re: 16 bit LAB in TIFF - documentation update", by Chris Cox
2002.03.06 01:03 "Re: 16 bit LAB in TIFF - documentation update", by Martin Bailey
2002.03.06 03:02 "Re: 16 bit LAB in TIFF - documentation update", by Chris Cox
2002.03.07 13:35 "Re: 16 bit LAB in TIFF - documentation update", by Marti Maria
2002.03.21 00:24 "16 bit LAB in TIFF - second pass", by Chris Cox
2002.03.21 13:00 "Re: 16 bit LAB in TIFF - second pass", by Marti Maria

2002.03.05 13:05 "Re: 16 bit LAB in TIFF - documentation update", by Marti Maria

Hi Chris,

In first place I would like to thank both Adobe for this TN and you for
posting it here. Joris and me were struggling against several of those 
mutually incompatible proprietary encoding, and for sure the Adobe note has 
been clarifier.

I have still a couple of questions, which I'm sending to you abusing of your 
kindness. I understand probably you didn't even wrote this, but as a Adobe 
representative you are my best choice to get these ones answered.

a) A lot of experimentation did show me that Adobe is using D50 as white 
point. This clashes with the D65 required by old spec. Which white point is 
supposed to be used?

b) About ICCencoding. Lately, ICC has released spec 4.0, with several major 
changes. One of them that PCS L is no longer encoded as 0...ff00 but 0..ffff
I'm amazed by the side effects this would have in, for example, TIFF Lab. 
The note talks about ICCLab with encoding 0..65280 But in current ICC spec 
PCS is encoded as 0..65535.

Please take these comments just as what they are. Not complains but only 
additional clarifications . I'm very happy to have now the "canonical" guide 
to Lab TIFF

With Best Regards,
Martí Maria
The little cms project
http://www.littlecms.com
marti@littlecms.com