2010.02.15 13:16 "[Tiff] Using libtiff in Visual C++ 6.0", by Weichao Wang
- 2010.02.15 15:43 "Re: [Tiff] Using libtiff in Visual C++ 6.0", by Bob Friesenhahn
-
2010.02.15 18:19 "Re: [Tiff] Tiff Digest, Vol 69, Issue 9", by Spike McLarty
-
2010.02.17 12:36 "Re: [Tiff] Tiff Digest, Vol 69, Issue 10", by Weichao Wang
-
2010.02.17 14:41 "Re: [Tiff] Using libtiff in Visual C++ 6.0", by Edward Lam
- 2010.02.17 15:16 "Re: [Tiff] Using libtiff in Visual C++ 6.0", by Gerben Vos
-
2010.02.17 15:25 "Re: [Tiff] Using libtiff in Visual C++ 6.0", by Weichao Wang
-
2010.02.17 12:18 "Re: [Tiff] Using libtiff in Visual C++ 6.0", by Weichao Wang
- 2010.02.17 11:56 "Re: [Tiff] Using libtiff in Visual C++ 6.0", by Weichao Wang
- 2010.02.18 15:01 "Re: [Tiff] Using libtiff in Visual C++ 6.0", by Olivier Paquet
-
2010.02.17 12:18 "Re: [Tiff] Using libtiff in Visual C++ 6.0", by Weichao Wang
-
2010.02.17 14:41 "Re: [Tiff] Using libtiff in Visual C++ 6.0", by Edward Lam
-
2010.02.17 12:36 "Re: [Tiff] Tiff Digest, Vol 69, Issue 10", by Weichao Wang
- 2010.02.16 14:08 "Re: [Tiff] Using libtiff in Visual C++ 6.0", by Olivier Paquet
2010.02.16 01:25 "Re: [Tiff] Using libtiff in Visual C++ 6.0", by Bob Friesenhahn
So applications compiled with VC++ 6 are usually far more portable than applications compiled with later VC++ versions.
I don't disagree with your various opinions. It still makes sense in some situations. That is why I keep a working copy of VC++ 6 here.
There may come a time when applications built with VC++ 6 won't work any more due to security and functionality concerns.
Bob
--
Bob Friesenhahn
bfriesen@simple.dallas.tx.us, http://www.simplesystems.org/users/bfriesen/
GraphicsMagick Maintainer, http://www.GraphicsMagick.org/