2001.06.18 12:38 "Size limitations.", by Bruno Ledoux

2001.06.20 16:45 "Re: Size limitations.", by Peter Montgomery

Tom,

You bring up a good point about the auto-replies coming back to the list. However, when I last posted I got the following:

--------------------------------------
Reply 1 from Max Martinez:

>Please pardon any delays in my reply. I will be out of the office until
>Monday, June 25th.
>
>Thanks.
>
>Max
--------------------------------------
Reply 2:

>L'utente non e' raggiungibile all'indirizzo specificato. Pregasi
>verificare l'indirizzo e reinviare il messsaggio.
>User cannot be reached at the specified address. Please check the
>address and resend the message.
>
>Warning, delivery failure! This is a status message indicating that a
>message could not be delivered to 1 or more recipients.
>
>Original message subject: Re: Size limitations.
>Date received: 19-Jun-2001 17:33:48 +0200
>
>
>Recipients and delivery history
>
>l.severini@computime.it
 --------------------------------------
Reply 3:

>tiff-outgoing@siatel.ro - no such user here.
>
>There is no user by that name at this server.
--------------------------------------

Max's message is annoying because I don't know him nor do I care that he's out of the office. As for the other two, they apparently don't exist anymore, but they're still on the list. Hello? Is anyone running this thing? Remove them from the list! Please! Clearly I am outvoted an having the list put it's own address in the "To:" field, but does anyone have aproblem with getting rid of people who aren't on the list? I don't see that as unreasonable. Why does every person who posts have to learn what people are no longer at some email address? Why doesn't the list owner take care of this?

Thanks,
PeterM