AWARE [SYSTEMS] Imaging expertise for the Delphi developer
AWare Systems, Imaging expertise for the Delphi developer, Home TIFF and LibTiff Mailing List Archive

LibTiff Mailing List

TIFF and LibTiff Mailing List Archive
December 2006

Previous Thread
Next Thread

Previous by Thread
Next by Thread

Previous by Date
Next by Date

Contact

The TIFF Mailing List Homepage
This list is run by Frank Warmerdam
Archive maintained by AWare Systems



Valid HTML 4.01!



Thread

2006.12.05 15:52 "Grayscale, or is it?", by Joris Van Damme
2006.12.05 17:18 "Re: Grayscale, or is it?", by Bob Friesenhahn
2006.12.05 17:34 "Re: Grayscale, or is it?", by Joris Van Damme
2006.12.05 17:45 "Re: Grayscale, or is it?", by Bob Friesenhahn
2006.12.05 18:44 "Re: Grayscale, or is it?", by Joris Van Damme
2006.12.05 22:10 "Re: Grayscale, or is it?", by Frank Warmerdam
2006.12.05 20:37 "Re: Grayscale, or is it?", by Joris Van Damme
2006.12.05 21:16 "Re: Grayscale, or is it?", by Edward Lam
2006.12.05 21:30 "Re: Grayscale, or is it?", by Joris Van Damme
2006.12.05 22:28 "Re: Grayscale, or is it?", by Edward Lam
2006.12.05 22:41 "Re: Grayscale, or is it?", by Jean-yves Le Ridant
2006.12.05 23:13 "Re: Grayscale, or is it?", by Bob Friesenhahn
2006.12.05 23:29 "Re: Grayscale, or is it?", by Phillip Crews
2006.12.06 02:05 "Re: Grayscale, or is it?", by Graeme Gill
2006.12.05 22:56 "Re: Grayscale, or is it?", by Glenn Widener
2006.12.05 23:26 "Re: Grayscale, or is it?", by Toby Thain
2006.12.06 01:58 "Re: Grayscale, or is it?", by Graeme Gill
2006.12.06 04:45 "Re: Grayscale, or is it?", by Edward Lam
2006.12.06 20:56 "Re: Grayscale, or is it?", by Joris Van Damme
2006.12.06 22:19 "Re: Grayscale, or is it?", by Graeme Gill
2006.12.06 23:30 "Re: Grayscale, or is it?", by Joris Van Damme
2006.12.07 01:28 "Re: Grayscale, or is it?", by Graeme Gill
2006.12.07 07:45 "Re: Grayscale, or is it?", by Joris Van Damme
2006.12.06 20:56 "Re: Grayscale, or is it?", by Joris Van Damme
2006.12.06 21:57 "Re: Grayscale, or is it?", by Graeme Gill

2006.12.05 17:34 "Re: Grayscale, or is it?", by Joris Van Damme

Bob,

Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
> For scientific/sensing applications, grayscale can mean almost
> anything, but for most of the world grayscale is Rec.601 Luma with
> gamma = 1/2.2.  That is because grayscale for TVs came first and color
> was added later.  For modern computer and HDTV displays, Rec.709 Luma
> is more appropriate, but it is still based on gamma = 1/2.2.

In other words, if you need to display the TIFF greyscale on an sRGB
monitor, then you're not applying any gamma correction to it, which is
consistent LibTiff RGBA interface implementation, and very likely
consistent with 95% of common practice out there?

Do you agree that this most common practice violates the quoted remark
from the spec?

(I'm not being religious about the spec here, I'm merely trying to sort
things out and arrive at a consensus in the mailing list and mailing
list archive.)


Best regards,

Joris Van Damme
info@awaresystems.be
http://www.awaresystems.be/
Download your free TIFF tag viewer for windows here:
http://www.awaresystems.be/imaging/tiff/astifftagviewer.html