AWARE [SYSTEMS] Imaging expertise for the Delphi developer
AWare Systems, Imaging expertise for the Delphi developer, Home TIFF and LibTiff Mailing List Archive

LibTiff Mailing List

TIFF and LibTiff Mailing List Archive
November 2007

Previous Thread
Next Thread

Previous by Thread
Next by Thread

Previous by Date
Next by Date

Contact

The TIFF Mailing List Homepage
This list is run by Frank Warmerdam
Archive maintained by AWare Systems



Valid HTML 4.01!



Thread

2007.11.21 18:52 "tag content size limit?", by Frank Warmerdam
2007.11.22 08:05 "Re: tag content size limit?", by Rob Van Den Tillaart
2007.12.08 05:51 "dpi settings", by Ron Croonenberg
2007.12.08 14:56 "Re: dpi settings", by Bob Friesenhahn
2007.12.08 18:34 "Re: dpi settings", by Ron Croonenberg
2007.12.08 20:39 "another rookie question", by Ron Croonenberg
2007.12.09 03:02 "Re: dpi settings", by Graeme Gill
2007.12.09 14:05 "Re: dpi settings", by Toby Thain
2007.12.09 14:44 "Re: dpi settings", by Graeme Gill
2007.12.09 15:03 "Re: dpi settings", by Toby Thain
2007.12.09 15:58 "Re: dpi settings", by Bob Friesenhahn
2007.12.09 16:04 "Re: dpi settings", by Toby Thain
2007.12.09 16:33 "Re: dpi settings", by Andrey Kiselev
2007.12.09 17:15 "Re: dpi settings", by Bob Friesenhahn
2007.12.09 18:39 "Re: dpi settings", by Andrey Kiselev
2007.12.09 18:54 "Re: dpi settings", by Toby Thain
2007.12.09 19:46 "Re: dpi settings", by Bob Friesenhahn
2007.12.10 01:01 "Re: dpi settings", by Graeme Gill
2007.12.10 01:43 "Re: dpi settings", by Toby Thain
2007.12.10 02:49 "Re: dpi settings", by Graeme Gill
2007.12.10 04:42 "Re: dpi settings", by Ron Croonenberg
2007.12.10 06:21 "Re: dpi settings", by Toby Thain
2007.12.10 02:10 "Re: dpi settings", by Ron Croonenberg
2007.12.10 02:54 "Re: dpi settings", by Graeme Gill

2007.12.09 15:03 "Re: dpi settings", by Toby Thain

On 9-Dec-07, at 12:44 PM, Graeme Gill wrote:

> Toby Thain wrote:
>> A rather nugatory remark, especially given the existence of the   
>> RATIONAL type in TIFF. I think around the time of TIFF's  
>> conception  it was not unusual in Europe to specify pixels per  
>> centimetre, which  might explain the choice of base unit. But  
>> really, does it matter?
>
> Only that it seems to be echo'd in some applications (Photoshop
> comes to mind, although maybe more recent versions have addressed
> this), and I'm therefore wondering if it's generally understood in
> the U.S. that cm is not a preferred metric unit, and in practice
> seems to be falling out of popular usage in the rest of the world.

Is that so? I had not heard, and I've spent my whole life (thank God)  
in Metricated countries.

But none of that relates to the use of the resolution tag in TIFF  
except, as you say, as a possible temptation for non-Metric  
application designers to punt to.

As I say, when specifying metric resolution, pixels/cm has been past  
European practice (e.g. German imagesetters and scanners, and I think  
documents such as Karow's Digital Formats for Typefaces). Perhaps  
someone can chime in with the current practice. I'm sure Adobe is  
clever enough to honour it, European users would soon complain...

--Toby

>
> Graeme Gill.
> _______________________________________________
> Tiff mailing list: Tiff@lists.maptools.org
> http://lists.maptools.org/mailman/listinfo/tiff
> http://www.remotesensing.org/libtiff/