AWARE [SYSTEMS] Imaging expertise for the Delphi developer
AWare Systems, Imaging expertise for the Delphi developer, Home TIFF and LibTiff Mailing List Archive

LibTiff Mailing List

TIFF and LibTiff Mailing List Archive
December 2006

Previous Thread
Next Thread

Previous by Thread
Next by Thread

Previous by Date
Next by Date

Contact

The TIFF Mailing List Homepage
This list is run by Frank Warmerdam
Archive maintained by AWare Systems



Valid HTML 4.01!



Thread

2006.12.05 15:52 "Grayscale, or is it?", by Joris Van Damme
2006.12.05 17:18 "Re: Grayscale, or is it?", by Bob Friesenhahn
2006.12.05 17:34 "Re: Grayscale, or is it?", by Joris Van Damme
2006.12.05 17:45 "Re: Grayscale, or is it?", by Bob Friesenhahn
2006.12.05 18:44 "Re: Grayscale, or is it?", by Joris Van Damme
2006.12.05 22:10 "Re: Grayscale, or is it?", by Frank Warmerdam
2006.12.05 20:37 "Re: Grayscale, or is it?", by Joris Van Damme
2006.12.05 21:16 "Re: Grayscale, or is it?", by Edward Lam
2006.12.05 21:30 "Re: Grayscale, or is it?", by Joris Van Damme
2006.12.05 22:28 "Re: Grayscale, or is it?", by Edward Lam
2006.12.05 22:41 "Re: Grayscale, or is it?", by Jean-yves Le Ridant
2006.12.05 23:13 "Re: Grayscale, or is it?", by Bob Friesenhahn
2006.12.05 23:29 "Re: Grayscale, or is it?", by Phillip Crews
2006.12.06 02:05 "Re: Grayscale, or is it?", by Graeme Gill
2006.12.05 22:56 "Re: Grayscale, or is it?", by Glenn Widener
2006.12.05 23:26 "Re: Grayscale, or is it?", by Toby Thain
2006.12.06 01:58 "Re: Grayscale, or is it?", by Graeme Gill
2006.12.06 04:45 "Re: Grayscale, or is it?", by Edward Lam
2006.12.06 20:56 "Re: Grayscale, or is it?", by Joris Van Damme
2006.12.06 22:19 "Re: Grayscale, or is it?", by Graeme Gill
2006.12.06 23:30 "Re: Grayscale, or is it?", by Joris Van Damme
2006.12.07 01:28 "Re: Grayscale, or is it?", by Graeme Gill
2006.12.07 07:45 "Re: Grayscale, or is it?", by Joris Van Damme
2006.12.06 20:56 "Re: Grayscale, or is it?", by Joris Van Damme
2006.12.06 21:57 "Re: Grayscale, or is it?", by Graeme Gill

2006.12.07 01:28 "Re: Grayscale, or is it?", by Graeme Gill

Joris wrote:
> We don't really dissagree. I personally use the second option I
> enumerated, i.e. converting RGB to CIE Y and back to greyscale. That
> seems to be exactly what you propose. Is this an approximation, or is it
> 'actually correct'? I prefer to avoid these terms. Some people are bound
> to say CIE XYZ sucks and CIE L*a*b* is about as different from human
> vision as you can get. They may be right, they may be wrong. 

Sorry, I don't buy this "everybody's got an opinion" stuff when
it comes to things we can measure. You can quibble all you
like about whether the CIE observer curves are the best possible,
but the fact is that noone has come up with any alternatives
that are convincingly better in matching the measurements
in over 70 years. So Given an additive device like an RGB display,
we can prove that the CIE Y value is going to correspond as accurately
as we know how, to the equivalent monochrome intensity of
its RGB output.

Graeme Gill.