AWARE [SYSTEMS] Imaging expertise for the Delphi developer
AWare Systems, Imaging expertise for the Delphi developer, Home TIFF and LibTiff Mailing List Archive

LibTiff Mailing List

TIFF and LibTiff Mailing List Archive
November 2007

Previous Thread
Next Thread

Previous by Thread
Next by Thread

Previous by Date
Next by Date

Contact

The TIFF Mailing List Homepage
This list is run by Frank Warmerdam
Archive maintained by AWare Systems



Valid HTML 4.01!



Thread

2007.11.21 18:52 "tag content size limit?", by Frank Warmerdam
2007.11.22 08:05 "Re: tag content size limit?", by Rob Van Den Tillaart
2007.12.08 05:51 "dpi settings", by Ron Croonenberg
2007.12.08 14:56 "Re: dpi settings", by Bob Friesenhahn
2007.12.08 18:34 "Re: dpi settings", by Ron Croonenberg
2007.12.08 20:39 "another rookie question", by Ron Croonenberg
2007.12.09 03:02 "Re: dpi settings", by Graeme Gill
2007.12.09 14:05 "Re: dpi settings", by Toby Thain
2007.12.09 14:44 "Re: dpi settings", by Graeme Gill
2007.12.09 15:03 "Re: dpi settings", by Toby Thain
2007.12.09 15:58 "Re: dpi settings", by Bob Friesenhahn
2007.12.09 16:04 "Re: dpi settings", by Toby Thain
2007.12.09 16:33 "Re: dpi settings", by Andrey Kiselev
2007.12.09 17:15 "Re: dpi settings", by Bob Friesenhahn
2007.12.09 18:39 "Re: dpi settings", by Andrey Kiselev
2007.12.09 18:54 "Re: dpi settings", by Toby Thain
2007.12.09 19:46 "Re: dpi settings", by Bob Friesenhahn
2007.12.10 01:01 "Re: dpi settings", by Graeme Gill
2007.12.10 01:43 "Re: dpi settings", by Toby Thain
2007.12.10 02:49 "Re: dpi settings", by Graeme Gill
2007.12.10 04:42 "Re: dpi settings", by Ron Croonenberg
2007.12.10 06:21 "Re: dpi settings", by Toby Thain
2007.12.10 02:10 "Re: dpi settings", by Ron Croonenberg
2007.12.10 02:54 "Re: dpi settings", by Graeme Gill

2007.11.21 18:52 "tag content size limit?", by Frank Warmerdam

Joris,

I have run into problems with my attempts to create a TIFF file with
1333333 strips.  Attempts to read the the stripoffsets tag results
in an error in TIFFReadDirEntryErr() with this logic:

	if ((uint64)(4*1024*1024/typesize)<direntry->tdir_count)
		return(TIFFReadDirEntryErrSizesan);
	if ((uint64)(4*1024*1024/desttypesize)<direntry->tdir_count)
		return(TIFFReadDirEntryErrSizesan);

The logic seems to assume that any tag contents larger than 4MB likely
implies a corrupt file.  Is there a particular reason we should put in
place such a restriction?  Should the restriction be removed?  Relaxed?
(perhaps upped to any tag value larger than 1GB is likely corruption?  or
any tag value larger than the file itself is?

Best regards,
-- 
---------------------------------------+--------------------------------------
I set the clouds in motion - turn up   | Frank Warmerdam, warmerdam@pobox.com
light and sound - activate the windows | http://pobox.com/~warmerdam
and watch the world go round - Rush    | President OSGeo, http://osgeo.org