| AWARE [SYSTEMS] | Imaging expertise for the Delphi developer | |||||||
![]() |
TIFF and LibTiff Mailing List Archive | |||||||
LibTiff Mailing List
TIFF and LibTiff Mailing List Archive Contact
The TIFF Mailing List Homepage |
Thread2007.02.01 18:34 "Re: Interpreting SubIFDs tag", by Joris Van DammePhil, Phil Harvey wrote: > > Here is the document that invented the SubIFD concept -- this is the > > "Tiff Trees" approach. > > (http://partners.adobe.com/public/developer/en/tiff/TIFFPM6.pdf) > > To quote this specification: > > "If there is more than 1 child image for a given parent image, the > NextIFD value of Child #1 must point to Child #2, and so on. The last > Child’s NextIFD value must be zero." > > I should point out that Adobe themselves don't store multiple > SubIFD's like this. > > The current version of the Adobe DNG converter writes multiple > SubIFD's by storing a separate pointer for each in the SubIFD tag > (and each SubIFD has a zero NextIFD pointer). > > But this is definitely not the first time that Adobe has ignored > their own specification. I don't think they ignored their own specification... A subpart of a spec, is never able to overwrite the grand scheme. The grand scheme does any tag to be an array of values. Best regards, Joris Van Damme info@awaresystems.be http://www.awaresystems.be/ Download your free TIFF tag viewer for windows here: http://www.awaresystems.be/imaging/tiff/astifftagviewer.html |
|||||||