AWARE [SYSTEMS] Imaging expertise for the Delphi developer
AWare Systems, Imaging expertise for the Delphi developer, Home TIFF and LibTiff Mailing List Archive

LibTiff Mailing List

TIFF and LibTiff Mailing List Archive
January 2007

Previous Thread
Next Thread

Previous by Thread
Next by Thread

Previous by Date
Next by Date

Contact

The TIFF Mailing List Homepage
This list is run by Frank Warmerdam
Archive maintained by AWare Systems



Valid HTML 4.01!



Thread

2007.01.17 02:25 "Elevation Data", by Craig Bruce
2007.01.17 02:57 "Re: Elevation Data", by Bob Friesenhahn
2007.01.17 08:07 "Re: Elevation Data", by Joris Van Damme
2007.01.17 15:24 "Re: Elevation Data", by Ed Grissom
2007.01.17 15:55 "Re: Elevation Data", by Joris Van Damme
2007.01.17 16:03 "Re: Elevation Data", by Ed Grissom
2007.01.17 16:20 "Re: Elevation Data", by Joris Van Damme
2007.01.17 16:52 "Re: Elevation Data", by Ed Grissom
2007.01.17 17:20 "Re: Elevation Data", by Joris Van Damme
2007.01.17 19:26 "Re: Elevation Data", by Ed Grissom
2007.01.17 20:22 "Re: Elevation Data", by Joris Van Damme
2007.01.17 20:52 "Re: Elevation Data", by Joris Van Damme
2007.01.17 21:00 "Re: Elevation Data", by Bob Friesenhahn
2007.01.17 21:58 "Re: Elevation Data", by Joris Van Damme
2007.01.17 22:18 "Re: Elevation Data", by Bob Friesenhahn
2007.01.18 11:09 "Re: Elevation Data", by Andrey Kiselev
2007.01.17 20:00 "Re: Elevation Data", by Craig Bruce
2007.01.17 17:01 "Re: Elevation Data", by Bob Friesenhahn
2007.01.17 18:35 "Re: Elevation Data", by Joris Van Damme
2007.01.17 21:08 "Re: Elevation Data", by Frank Warmerdam
2007.01.17 19:27 "Re: Elevation Data", by Frank Warmerdam
2007.01.17 16:08 "Re: Elevation Data", by Bob Friesenhahn
2007.01.17 16:30 "Re: Elevation Data", by Joris Van Damme
2007.01.17 19:03 "Re: Elevation Data", by Frank Warmerdam
2007.01.17 17:28 "Re: Elevation Data", by Joris Van Damme
2007.01.17 21:18 "Re: Elevation Data", by Frank Warmerdam
2007.01.17 16:51 "Re: Elevation Data", by Gerben Vos
2007.01.17 18:03 "Re: Elevation Data", by Joris Van Damme
2007.01.17 16:27 "Re: Elevation Data", by Frank Warmerdam
2007.01.17 19:00 "Re: Elevation Data", by Joris Van Damme
2007.01.17 21:51 "Re: Elevation Data", by Frank Warmerdam
2007.01.17 03:35 "Re: Elevation Data", by Frank Warmerdam
2007.01.17 08:00 "Re: Elevation Data", by Joris Van Damme
2007.01.17 20:07 "Re: Elevation Data", by Joris Van Damme

2007.01.17 19:26 "Re: Elevation Data", by Ed Grissom

In a previous message, Joris said: 

> Grissom, Ed wrote:
> > Anyone else want to come along ?
> 
> We could come to an agreed recommendation I think...
> 
> How about this...
> 
> ** Writer recommendation **
> 

I can agree with this.  At least for me I am going to start writing them
very soon now. 

> 
> ** Reader recommendation **
> 
> Readers are recommended to check the SMin/SMax tags when reading
> floating point data. If they are present, their values is to be taken
as
> a firm indication of range, meaning any image data outside the range
is
> taken to be 'blacker-then-black' or similar and needs to be clipped in
> any normal rendering process, 

I'm good up to here..

> and, conversely, any partial use of the
> range specified in SMin/SMax is to be taken as partial use of the
> colorspace or range, and does not imply histogram stretching or
> equalising is required.

I'm not sure that I understand this "partial use" and what you are
saying it does or does not imply.  I just need more explanation.   

What bothers me is that I think I *do* want to stretch or equalize this
data to fit the 0..255 range of my monitor when I display it. 


> 
> If the SMin/SMax tags aren't present, readers are recommended to take
> that as a firm indication the standard 'intrinsic' range is use.

In practice, this is going to be the hardest one.  I would almost prefer
to say that if the tags are not present then it is the wild wild west
and you need to be very careful about what you assume about the data.  


  -----


I don't understand this distinction (in other messages) about "images".
Obviously, there are some severe deficiencies in the allowed TIFF
Photometric spaces (http://www.asmail.be/msg0055503273.html), but if I
have a grid of values, there should be a way for any app to easily
display the data as an image on a 0..255 monitor, no matter if the data
is stored as bit, byte, signed short, unsigned short, float, or double
(or whatever else). 





-- 
ed grissom
ed.grissom@intergraph.com