AWARE [SYSTEMS] Imaging expertise for the Delphi developer
AWare Systems, Imaging expertise for the Delphi developer, Home TIFF and LibTiff Mailing List Archive

LibTiff Mailing List

TIFF and LibTiff Mailing List Archive
October 2004

Previous Thread
Next Thread

Previous by Thread
Next by Thread

Previous by Date
Next by Date

Contact

The TIFF Mailing List Homepage
This list is run by Frank Warmerdam
Archive maintained by AWare Systems



Valid HTML 4.01!



Thread

2004.10.01 07:22 "BigTIFF extension issue", by Joris Van Damme
2004.10.01 16:41 "Re: BigTIFF extension issue", by Ian Ameline
2004.10.01 16:53 "Re: BigTIFF extension issue", by Frank Warmerdam
2004.10.01 17:01 "Re: BigTIFF extension issue", by Joris Van Damme
2004.10.01 17:19 "Re: BigTIFF extension issue", by Steve Carlsen
2004.10.01 17:27 "Re: BigTIFF extension issue", by Chris Losinger
2004.10.01 17:48 "Re: BigTIFF extension issue", by Bob Friesenhahn
2004.10.01 17:48 "Re: BigTIFF extension issue", by Joris Van Damme
2004.10.01 17:50 "Re: BigTIFF extension issue", by Frank Warmerdam
2004.10.01 18:03 "Re: BigTIFF extension issue", by Chris Losinger
2004.10.01 22:22 "Re: BigTIFF extension issue", by Chris Cox
2004.10.02 01:21 "Re: BigTIFF extension issue", by Joris Van Damme
2004.10.02 01:45 "Re: BigTIFF extension issue", by Bob Friesenhahn
2004.10.02 03:19 "Re: BigTIFF extension issue", by Joris Van Damme
2004.10.02 10:20 "Re: BigTIFF extension issue", by Andy Cave
2004.10.03 15:59 "Re: BigTIFF extension issue", by Bob Friesenhahn
2004.10.04 08:53 "Re: BigTIFF extension issue", by Andy Cave
2004.10.04 11:56 "Re: BigTIFF extension issue", by Joris Van Damme
2004.10.02 03:43 "Re: BigTIFF extension issue", by Chris Cox
2004.10.02 04:10 "Re: BigTIFF extension issue", by Joris Van Damme
2004.10.02 04:41 "Re: BigTIFF extension issue", by Bob Friesenhahn
2004.10.02 04:53 "Re: BigTIFF extension issue", by Chris Cox
2004.10.02 10:28 "Re: BigTIFF extension issue", by Andy Cave
2004.10.03 00:39 "Re: BigTIFF extension issue", by Chris Cox
2004.10.04 08:34 "Re: BigTIFF extension issue", by Andy Cave
2004.10.04 14:02 "Re: BigTIFF extension issue", by Bob Friesenhahn
2004.10.04 14:21 "Re: BigTIFF extension issue", by Joris Van Damme
2004.10.04 14:57 "Re: BigTIFF extension issue", by Andy Cave
2004.10.04 23:11 "Re: BigTIFF extension issue", by Chris Cox
2004.10.05 08:43 "Re: BigTIFF extension issue", by Andy Cave
2004.10.05 13:27 "Re: BigTIFF extension issue", by Joris Van Damme
2004.10.04 11:29 "Re: BigTIFF extension issue", by Rob Tillaart
2004.10.04 14:54 "Re: BigTIFF extension issue", by Bob Friesenhahn
2004.10.04 15:04 "Re: BigTIFF extension issue", by Andy Cave
2004.10.04 15:23 "Re: BigTIFF extension issue", by Joris Van Damme
2004.10.04 15:43 "Re: BigTIFF extension issue", by Bob Friesenhahn
2004.10.04 15:54 "Re: BigTIFF extension issue", by Joris Van Damme
2004.10.04 16:50 "Re: BigTIFF extension issue", by Steve Carlsen
2004.10.04 18:20 "Re: BigTIFF extension issue", by Joris Van Damme
2004.10.04 18:30 "Re: BigTIFF extension issue", by Bill Bither
2004.10.04 18:36 "Re: BigTIFF extension issue", by Bob Friesenhahn
2004.10.04 18:46 "Re: BigTIFF extension issue", by Joris Van Damme
2004.10.04 18:59 "Re: BigTIFF extension issue", by Andy Cave
2004.10.05 14:41 "Re: BigTIFF extension issue", by Fernando Loygorri
2004.10.04 18:49 "Re: BigTIFF extension issue", by Andy Cave
2004.10.04 19:00 "Re: BigTIFF extension issue", by Bob Friesenhahn

2004.10.04 14:54 "Re: BigTIFF extension issue", by Bob Friesenhahn

On Mon, 4 Oct 2004, Rob van den Tillaart wrote:
>
> If we 'overload' the extention ".tif", we help the user as they will
> assume correctly it is an image file. If we introduce a new (especially
> cryptic e.g. .tf8) extention the users do not associate it with an
> imageformat.

In that case I suggest that we use the extension ".png" since it has 
been in use for less time than ".tif" and therefore the associated 
image application is more likely to be maintained and somewhat more 
likely to be able to read the BigTIFF file.

> Maybe when the new extention is descriptive enough. e.g. .bigtif
> (english speaking) users will understand it. Lucky for us most OS's
> today can work with long extentions. However seen a lot of discussion on
> this topic I currently prefer to stick with the ".tif" extention, as
> users will associate correctly with it. Application should hide the
> details of the implementations.

With Microsoft Windows we are blessed with an operating system which 
supports long file names, but only looks at the first three characters 
of the file extension when it decides what to do.  In this case a 
".bigtif" exension would be treated as the extension ".big" by 
Windows.

Bob
======================================
Bob Friesenhahn
bfriesen@simple.dallas.tx.us
http://www.simplesystems.org/users/bfriesen