AWARE [SYSTEMS] Imaging expertise for the Delphi developer
AWare Systems, Imaging expertise for the Delphi developer, Home TIFF and LibTiff Mailing List Archive

LibTiff Mailing List

TIFF and LibTiff Mailing List Archive
October 2004

Previous Thread
Next Thread

Previous by Thread
Next by Thread

Previous by Date
Next by Date

Contact

The TIFF Mailing List Homepage
This list is run by Frank Warmerdam
Archive maintained by AWare Systems



Valid HTML 4.01!



Thread

2004.10.01 07:22 "BigTIFF extension issue", by Joris Van Damme
2004.10.01 16:41 "Re: BigTIFF extension issue", by Ian Ameline
2004.10.01 16:53 "Re: BigTIFF extension issue", by Frank Warmerdam
2004.10.01 17:01 "Re: BigTIFF extension issue", by Joris Van Damme
2004.10.01 17:19 "Re: BigTIFF extension issue", by Steve Carlsen
2004.10.01 17:27 "Re: BigTIFF extension issue", by Chris Losinger
2004.10.01 17:48 "Re: BigTIFF extension issue", by Bob Friesenhahn
2004.10.01 17:48 "Re: BigTIFF extension issue", by Joris Van Damme
2004.10.01 17:50 "Re: BigTIFF extension issue", by Frank Warmerdam
2004.10.01 18:03 "Re: BigTIFF extension issue", by Chris Losinger
2004.10.01 22:22 "Re: BigTIFF extension issue", by Chris Cox
2004.10.02 01:21 "Re: BigTIFF extension issue", by Joris Van Damme
2004.10.02 01:45 "Re: BigTIFF extension issue", by Bob Friesenhahn
2004.10.02 03:19 "Re: BigTIFF extension issue", by Joris Van Damme
2004.10.02 10:20 "Re: BigTIFF extension issue", by Andy Cave
2004.10.03 15:59 "Re: BigTIFF extension issue", by Bob Friesenhahn
2004.10.04 08:53 "Re: BigTIFF extension issue", by Andy Cave
2004.10.04 11:56 "Re: BigTIFF extension issue", by Joris Van Damme
2004.10.02 03:43 "Re: BigTIFF extension issue", by Chris Cox
2004.10.02 04:10 "Re: BigTIFF extension issue", by Joris Van Damme
2004.10.02 04:41 "Re: BigTIFF extension issue", by Bob Friesenhahn
2004.10.02 04:53 "Re: BigTIFF extension issue", by Chris Cox
2004.10.02 10:28 "Re: BigTIFF extension issue", by Andy Cave
2004.10.03 00:39 "Re: BigTIFF extension issue", by Chris Cox
2004.10.04 08:34 "Re: BigTIFF extension issue", by Andy Cave
2004.10.04 14:02 "Re: BigTIFF extension issue", by Bob Friesenhahn
2004.10.04 14:21 "Re: BigTIFF extension issue", by Joris Van Damme
2004.10.04 14:57 "Re: BigTIFF extension issue", by Andy Cave
2004.10.04 23:11 "Re: BigTIFF extension issue", by Chris Cox
2004.10.05 08:43 "Re: BigTIFF extension issue", by Andy Cave
2004.10.05 13:27 "Re: BigTIFF extension issue", by Joris Van Damme
2004.10.04 11:29 "Re: BigTIFF extension issue", by Rob Tillaart
2004.10.04 14:54 "Re: BigTIFF extension issue", by Bob Friesenhahn
2004.10.04 15:04 "Re: BigTIFF extension issue", by Andy Cave
2004.10.04 15:23 "Re: BigTIFF extension issue", by Joris Van Damme
2004.10.04 15:43 "Re: BigTIFF extension issue", by Bob Friesenhahn
2004.10.04 15:54 "Re: BigTIFF extension issue", by Joris Van Damme
2004.10.04 16:50 "Re: BigTIFF extension issue", by Steve Carlsen
2004.10.04 18:20 "Re: BigTIFF extension issue", by Joris Van Damme
2004.10.04 18:30 "Re: BigTIFF extension issue", by Bill Bither
2004.10.04 18:36 "Re: BigTIFF extension issue", by Bob Friesenhahn
2004.10.04 18:46 "Re: BigTIFF extension issue", by Joris Van Damme
2004.10.04 18:59 "Re: BigTIFF extension issue", by Andy Cave
2004.10.05 14:41 "Re: BigTIFF extension issue", by Fernando Loygorri
2004.10.04 18:49 "Re: BigTIFF extension issue", by Andy Cave
2004.10.04 19:00 "Re: BigTIFF extension issue", by Bob Friesenhahn

2004.10.04 14:21 "Re: BigTIFF extension issue", by Joris Van Damme

> > I'm curious - can you name some examples please. I'd be interested in
> > hearing
> > about some and seeing exactly what the differences are/were between
> > 'changes'.
>
> The BMP format is an example of a format which has been extended
> without breaking a lot of existing software.  Recently BMP v3 was
> introduced.  This was possible because the additions were made in a
> portion of the file header which can be skipped based on an offset
> value which appears early in the header.  Properly written old readers
> should automatically skip the new stuff (in practice some readers were
> broken).

A very fine example... on how the extension remained unchanged, because it was
still regarded the same file format. A very fine example, too, on how even much
more drastic changes to the format's specification, still do not suffice to
regard the new version as a different format.

I believe the point of view you defend is that the extension should be changed.

If you go back, you'll see that Andy was responding to Chris saying companies do
sometimes change extension when brewing a next version of a format. Thus, he was
asking for examples that involved changing the extension. Possibly, but not
certainly, and I'm not quoting him on this but going a long way interpreting, he
was trying to make the point that most of the proper examples that could be
given involve a single company.


Joris Van Damme
info@awaresystems.be
http://www.awaresystems.be
Download your free TIFF tag viewer for windows here:
http://www.awaresystems.be/imaging/tiff/astifftagviewer.html