AWARE [SYSTEMS] Imaging expertise for the Delphi developer
AWare Systems, Imaging expertise for the Delphi developer, Home TIFF and LibTiff Mailing List Archive

LibTiff Mailing List

TIFF and LibTiff Mailing List Archive
July 2008

Previous Thread
Next Thread

Previous by Thread
Next by Thread

Previous by Date
Next by Date

Contact

The TIFF Mailing List Homepage
This list is run by Frank Warmerdam
Archive maintained by AWare Systems



Valid HTML 4.01!



Thread

2008.07.02 17:23 "BigTiff Support", by Alexander Johnson
2008.07.02 17:27 "BigTiff Support", by Alexander Johnson
2008.07.02 17:43 "Re: BigTiff Support", by Bob Friesenhahn
2008.07.02 18:07 "Re: BigTiff Support", by Edward Lam
2008.07.02 18:18 "Re: BigTiff Support", by Bob Friesenhahn
2008.07.02 18:47 "Re: BigTiff Support", by Edward Lam
2008.07.03 07:29 "Re: BigTiff Support", by Alexander Johnson
2008.07.03 14:58 "Re: eta for bigtiff support?", by Gary Mcgath
2008.07.03 15:26 "Re: eta for bigtiff support?", by Bob Friesenhahn
2008.07.03 15:28 "Re: eta for bigtiff support?", by Frank Warmerdam
2008.07.03 15:46 "Re: eta for bigtiff support?", by Gary Mcgath
2008.07.03 18:19 "Re: eta for bigtiff support?", by Stephen Carlsen
2008.07.10 21:07 "Re: eta for bigtiff support?", by Joris Van Damme
2008.07.10 21:50 "Re: eta for bigtiff support?", by Gary Mcgath
2008.07.10 23:17 "Re: eta for bigtiff support?", by Bob Friesenhahn
2008.07.10 23:25 "Re: eta for bigtiff support?", by Chris Cox
2008.07.11 00:36 "Re: eta for bigtiff support?", by Bob Friesenhahn
2008.07.11 00:38 "Re: eta for bigtiff support?", by Chris Cox
2008.07.11 12:56 "Re: eta for bigtiff support?", by Gary Mcgath
2008.07.11 16:34 "Re: eta for bigtiff support?", by Bob Friesenhahn
2008.07.11 13:25 "Re: eta for bigtiff support?", by Edward Lam
2008.07.02 17:32 "BigTiff Support", by Alexander Johnson

2008.07.10 23:25 "Re: eta for bigtiff support?", by Chris Cox

If you continue to use the .tif/.tiff extension - then the MIME type should
also remain the same.

Chris



On 7/10/08 4:17 PM, "Bob Friesenhahn" <bfriesen@simple.dallas.tx.us> wrote:

> On Thu, 10 Jul 2008, Gary McGath wrote:
>> There's still the open issue of the MIME type, which was discussed a while
>> back and then dropped. As I read IETF RFC 3302
>> (http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc3302.txt), "image/tiff" is defined in terms of
>> TIFF 6.0 conformity, so it would be incorrect to refer to a BigTIFF document
>> as "image/tiff". IANA has also registered a MIME type "image/tiff-fx" for
>> TIFF-FX, defined by RFC 3950, so it would be consistent to shoot for
>> "image/tiff-big". IANA requires "publication by a formal standards body,"
>> though, so it would be more realistic to stake out "image/x-tiff-big".
> 
> This is closely related to the file extension issue.  If the file
> extension used is similar to existing TIFF (as many here seem to
> prefer), then the only way to determine its type is by inspecting the
> file header.
> 
> Updated file formats do not always obtain new file extensions or MIME
> types.  BMP, Postscript, and PDF are excellent examples of this.
> 
> My own inclination is to continue using the existing TIFF file
> extensions and TIFF MIME type and let the end applications and users
> figure things out.  If users start having problems with opening files,
> then they will complain to their application vendor so that the
> updated format is supported.
> 
> If TIFF is defined by TIFF 6.0 conformity then many existing TIFF
> files do not conform.  For example, JPEG compression in TIFF does not
> conform.
> 
> Bob
> ======================================
> Bob Friesenhahn
> bfriesen@simple.dallas.tx.us, http://www.simplesystems.org/users/bfriesen/
> GraphicsMagick Maintainer,    http://www.GraphicsMagick.org/
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Tiff mailing list: Tiff@lists.maptools.org
> http://lists.maptools.org/mailman/listinfo/tiff
> http://www.remotesensing.org/libtiff/