AWARE [SYSTEMS] Imaging expertise for the Delphi developer
AWare Systems, Imaging expertise for the Delphi developer, Home TIFF and LibTiff Mailing List Archive

LibTiff Mailing List

TIFF and LibTiff Mailing List Archive
October 2004

Previous Thread
Next Thread

Previous by Thread
Next by Thread

Previous by Date
Next by Date

Contact

The TIFF Mailing List Homepage
This list is run by Frank Warmerdam
Archive maintained by AWare Systems



Valid HTML 4.01!



Thread

2004.10.03 22:20 "IPTC tags", by Gary Lawton
2004.10.03 22:45 "Re: IPTC tags", by Bob Friesenhahn
2004.10.03 23:04 "Re: IPTC tags", by Bob Friesenhahn
2004.10.04 21:47 "Re: IPTC tags", by Gary Lawton
2004.10.04 21:55 "Re: IPTC tags", by Bob Friesenhahn
2004.10.04 12:15 "Re: IPTC tags", by Joris Van Damme
2004.10.04 13:35 "Re: IPTC tags", by Joris Van Damme
2004.10.04 15:14 "Re: IPTC tags", by Bob Friesenhahn
2004.10.04 15:44 "Re: IPTC tags", by Joris Van Damme
2004.10.04 15:53 "Re: IPTC tags", by Bob Friesenhahn

2004.10.04 15:44 "Re: IPTC tags", by Joris Van Damme

> > Best I could find on the DataType, BYTE, LONG, and ASCII all seems possible.
> > That is suspicious, at the very least, especially with byte order issues in
> > mind. If anyone can provide better information, please do so.
>
> Libtiff is using LONG.

So? LibTiff is not intended to be looked upon as having specification value. I
am looking for defenite sources. In the absence thereof, I have looked at
LibTiff as one of the secondary source. LibTiff as a secondary source is what
moved me to including LONG as one of the datatypes, for now. Other secondary
sources mention BYTE and ASCII. With byte order issues in mind, the combination
of these types is very suspicious, as I wrote before, which increases the need
for a source with specification value.

> > Also, not being familiar with IPTC, my best description is 'metadata'. If
> > anyone is more knowledgable and able to make a small list of most 
> > common/usefull fields in this metadata, that then describes the tag a lot 
> > better, or otherwise better define the tag, please let me know.
>
> Metadata is good.

Metadata is mighty vague, and would equally well cover a handfull of other tags.
A small list of most common/usefull fields remains desirable as a more helpfull
tag description.


Joris Van Damme
info@awaresystems.be
http://www.awaresystems.be
Download your free TIFF tag viewer for windows here:
http://www.awaresystems.be/imaging/tiff/astifftagviewer.html