AWARE [SYSTEMS] Imaging expertise for the Delphi developer
AWare Systems, Imaging expertise for the Delphi developer, Home TIFF and LibTiff Mailing List Archive

LibTiff Mailing List

TIFF and LibTiff Mailing List Archive
July 2008

Previous Thread
Next Thread

Previous by Thread
Next by Thread

Previous by Date
Next by Date

Contact

The TIFF Mailing List Homepage
This list is run by Frank Warmerdam
Archive maintained by AWare Systems



Valid HTML 4.01!



Thread

2008.07.02 17:23 "BigTiff Support", by Alexander Johnson
2008.07.02 17:27 "BigTiff Support", by Alexander Johnson
2008.07.02 17:43 "Re: BigTiff Support", by Bob Friesenhahn
2008.07.02 18:07 "Re: BigTiff Support", by Edward Lam
2008.07.02 18:18 "Re: BigTiff Support", by Bob Friesenhahn
2008.07.02 18:47 "Re: BigTiff Support", by Edward Lam
2008.07.03 07:29 "Re: BigTiff Support", by Alexander Johnson
2008.07.03 14:58 "Re: eta for bigtiff support?", by Gary Mcgath
2008.07.03 15:26 "Re: eta for bigtiff support?", by Bob Friesenhahn
2008.07.03 15:28 "Re: eta for bigtiff support?", by Frank Warmerdam
2008.07.03 15:46 "Re: eta for bigtiff support?", by Gary Mcgath
2008.07.03 18:19 "Re: eta for bigtiff support?", by Stephen Carlsen
2008.07.10 21:07 "Re: eta for bigtiff support?", by Joris Van Damme
2008.07.10 21:50 "Re: eta for bigtiff support?", by Gary Mcgath
2008.07.10 23:17 "Re: eta for bigtiff support?", by Bob Friesenhahn
2008.07.10 23:25 "Re: eta for bigtiff support?", by Chris Cox
2008.07.11 00:36 "Re: eta for bigtiff support?", by Bob Friesenhahn
2008.07.11 00:38 "Re: eta for bigtiff support?", by Chris Cox
2008.07.11 12:56 "Re: eta for bigtiff support?", by Gary Mcgath
2008.07.11 16:34 "Re: eta for bigtiff support?", by Bob Friesenhahn
2008.07.11 13:25 "Re: eta for bigtiff support?", by Edward Lam
2008.07.02 17:32 "BigTiff Support", by Alexander Johnson

2008.07.11 16:34 "Re: eta for bigtiff support?", by Bob Friesenhahn

On Fri, 11 Jul 2008, Gary McGath wrote:
>> 
>> If TIFF is defined by TIFF 6.0 conformity then many existing TIFF files do 
>> not conform.  For example, JPEG compression in TIFF does not conform.
>
> I'd have to look that one up, but doesn't it use extensibility mechanisms 
> which are consistent with 6.0?

JPEG in TIFF starts with TIFF 6.0 as a base but applications won't be 
able to read it unless they support JPEG in TIFF.  There are many 
other such situations.

As far as the PDF MIME type goes, I expect that you will find that 
there are several older RFCs which refer to earlier versions of the 
PDF specification.  It is common for RFCs to be retired by newer ones.

Bob
======================================
Bob Friesenhahn
bfriesen@simple.dallas.tx.us, http://www.simplesystems.org/users/bfriesen/
GraphicsMagick Maintainer,    http://www.GraphicsMagick.org/