AWARE [SYSTEMS] Imaging expertise for the Delphi developer
AWare Systems, Imaging expertise for the Delphi developer, Home TIFF and LibTiff Mailing List Archive

LibTiff Mailing List

TIFF and LibTiff Mailing List Archive
July 2007

Previous Thread
Next Thread

Previous by Thread
Next by Thread

Previous by Date
Next by Date

Contact

The TIFF Mailing List Homepage
This list is run by Frank Warmerdam
Archive maintained by AWare Systems



Valid HTML 4.01!



Thread

2007.07.01 03:01 "Big TIFF Sample Files", by <sc42business@mac.com>
2007.07.03 10:44 "Re: Big TIFF Sample Files", by Joris Van Damme
2007.07.03 12:15 "Re: Big TIFF Sample Files", by Joris Van Damme
2007.07.03 15:26 "Re: Big TIFF Sample Files", by Phil Harvey
2007.07.03 15:43 "Re: Big TIFF Sample Files", by Stephen Carlsen
2007.07.03 12:26 "Big TIFF Compression", by Andy Cave
2007.07.03 12:39 "Re: Big TIFF Compression", by Joris Van Damme
2007.07.03 13:02 "Re: Big TIFF Compression", by Andy Cave
2007.07.03 13:55 "Re: Big TIFF Compression", by Frank Warmerdam
2007.07.03 14:07 "Re: Big TIFF Compression", by Andy Cave
2007.07.03 14:37 "Re: Big TIFF Compression", by Joris Van Damme
2007.07.03 13:46 "Re: Big TIFF Compression", by Joris Van Damme
2007.07.03 14:23 "Re: Big TIFF Compression", by Andy Cave
2007.07.03 14:34 "Re: Big TIFF Compression", by Kemp Watson
2007.07.03 15:25 "Re: Big TIFF Compression", by Ed Grissom
2007.07.03 15:27 "Re: Big TIFF Compression", by Ed Grissom
2007.07.03 16:31 "Re: Big TIFF Compression", by Michael Wolf
2007.07.03 16:06 "Re: Big TIFF Compression", by Bob Friesenhahn
2007.07.03 19:28 "Re: Big TIFF Compression", by Chris Cox

2007.07.03 12:39 "Re: Big TIFF Compression", by Joris Van Damme

Andy,

Andy Cave wrote:
> A bit of a hi-jack, but it's a valid question. All these people who
> want to use BigTIFF, what sort of compression are they planning on
> using? Any? None? Is their image data 1 bit (Huffman, G3, G4, LZW,
> JBIG or...) or 8 bit (LZW, Flate or...)?
>
> Just curious.

As far as I know, the answer is 'any and all'. There's no reason I know off 
why their intention as to compression should be any different from the 
intention ClassicTIFF users had before. Except for...

Some TIFF users may have a slight preference for no compression, because of 
interchange reasons or some other private reasons that have to do with their 
image flow inside their process. It's reasonable to assume these users are 
the ones that suffer most from ClassicTIFF size limitation, so they might be 
the first to resort to BigTIFF in bigger numbers, so we might see a higher 
percentage of BigTIFF files that are not compressed, compared to ClassicTIFF 
files that are not compressed.

Also, some particular domains of applications of TIFF, like georeferencing 
and medical imaging software, might be the ones that traditionally write the 
largest TIFFs, and suffer the ClassicTIFF size limitation more then, say, 
FAX communication software. So, compression modes like JPEG or so that are 
often used in these fields, might also be seen in slightly higher 
percentages in BigTIFF.


Best regards,

Joris Van Damme
info@awaresystems.be
http://www.awaresystems.be/
Download your free TIFF tag viewer for windows here:
http://www.awaresystems.be/imaging/tiff/astifftagviewer.html