| AWARE [SYSTEMS] | Imaging expertise for the Delphi developer | |||||||
![]() |
TIFF and LibTiff Mailing List Archive | |||||||
LibTiff Mailing List
TIFF and LibTiff Mailing List Archive Contact
The TIFF Mailing List Homepage |
Thread2005.09.23 22:20 "Re: Additional Lossless Compression Schemes", by Chris CoxAt 5:11 PM -0400 9/23/05, Frank Warmerdam wrote: > > I was wondering if there is much interest in adding more lossless > compression schemes in libtiff. > > In addition to Packbits (pretty crappy) we have LZW and the more > recent Deflate. My understanding is that Deflate is usually better than > the old LZW though not as widely supported. Also, that Deflate > is essentially the "zip" compression type. Yes, yes, and yes. > Since then I have seen "gzip" on Unix, but I am not clear if that > is just deflate or not. > > Then came bzip2 which seem 5-10% better in that gzip on many > datasets. Since TIFF supports predictors, it can already do better than straight deflate. > Now looking around a bit I see LZMA which I have heard good things > about. > > http://www.7-zip.org/sdk.html > > Are there any opinions on possibly incorporating LZMA as an > additional compression type? Possibly - but it'll take a while to check the legal implications, get a couple of implementations going for cross testing, etc. And I'd expect it to be at least 10% better than deflate to be worth the effort... Chris |
|||||||