AWARE [SYSTEMS] Imaging expertise for the Delphi developer
AWare Systems, Imaging expertise for the Delphi developer, Home TIFF and LibTiff Mailing List Archive

LibTiff Mailing List

TIFF and LibTiff Mailing List Archive
September 2005

Previous Thread
Next Thread

Previous by Thread
Next by Thread

Previous by Date
Next by Date

Contact

The TIFF Mailing List Homepage
This list is run by Frank Warmerdam
Archive maintained by AWare Systems



Valid HTML 4.01!



Thread

2005.09.23 21:11 "Additional Lossless Compression Schemes", by Frank Warmerdam
2005.09.23 21:20 "Re: Additional Lossless Compression Schemes", by Bob Friesenhahn
2005.09.23 22:19 "Re: Additional Lossless Compression Schemes", by Chris Cox
2005.09.24 20:01 "Re: Additional Lossless Compression Schemes", by Leonard Rosenthol
2005.09.24 23:09 "Re: Additional Lossless Compression Schemes", by Bob Friesenhahn
2005.09.25 01:01 "Re: Additional Lossless Compression Schemes", by Chris Cox
2005.09.25 01:09 "Re: Additional Lossless Compression Schemes", by Joris Van Damme
2005.09.23 22:20 "Re: Additional Lossless Compression Schemes", by Chris Cox
2005.09.23 23:32 "Re: Additional Lossless Compression Schemes", by Philip Watkinson
2005.09.23 23:54 "Re: Additional Lossless Compression Schemes", by Chris Cox
2005.09.25 01:28 "Re: Additional Lossless Compression Schemes", by Joris Van Damme
2005.09.25 02:53 "Re: Additional Lossless Compression Schemes", by Bob Friesenhahn
2005.09.25 04:12 "Re: Additional Lossless Compression Schemes", by Joris Van Damme
2005.09.26 06:22 "Re: Additional Lossless Compression", by Rob Tillaart
2005.09.25 02:54 "Re: Additional Lossless Compression Schemes", by Frank Warmerdam
2005.09.25 04:16 "Re: Additional Lossless Compression Schemes", by Joris Van Damme
2005.09.25 15:14 "Re: Additional Lossless Compression Schemes", by Bob Friesenhahn
2005.09.27 02:20 "Re: Additional Lossless Compression Schemes", by Joris Van Damme
2005.09.27 02:26 "Re: Additional Lossless Compression Schemes", by Bob Friesenhahn
2005.09.27 02:29 "Re: Additional Lossless Compression Schemes", by Joris Van Damme
2005.09.27 02:34 "Re: Additional Lossless Compression Schemes", by Bob Friesenhahn
2005.09.27 03:36 "Re: Additional Lossless Compression Schemes", by Bill Bither
2005.09.27 04:01 "Re: Additional Lossless Compression Schemes", by Chris Cox
2005.09.25 19:27 "Re: Additional Lossless Compression Schemes", by <edward@sidefx.com>
2005.09.25 19:53 "Re: Additional Lossless Compression Schemes", by Andy Cave
2005.09.25 20:31 "Re: Additional Lossless Compression Schemes", by Bob Friesenhahn
2005.09.28 09:34 "Re: Additional Lossless Compression Schemes", by Kevin Wheatley
2005.09.26 14:58 "Re: Additional Lossless Compression Schemes", by Jason Frank
2005.09.27 02:24 "Re: Additional Lossless Compression Schemes", by Leonard Rosenthol
2005.09.27 02:44 "Re: Additional Lossless Compression Schemes", by Chris Cox
2005.09.27 01:05 "Re: Additional Lossless Compression Schemes", by <ron@debian.org>
2005.09.27 02:06 "Re: Additional Lossless Compression Schemes", by Joris Van Damme
2005.09.27 02:21 "Re: Additional Lossless Compression Schemes", by Bob Friesenhahn
2005.09.27 02:27 "Re: Additional Lossless Compression Schemes", by Joris Van Damme
2005.09.27 02:32 "Re: Additional Lossless Compression Schemes", by Bob Friesenhahn
2005.09.27 02:58 "Re: Additional Lossless Compression Schemes", by Joris Van Damme
2005.09.27 06:39 "Re: Additional Lossless Compression Schemes", by Frank Warmerdam
2005.09.27 14:47 "Re: Additional Lossless Compression Schemes", by Jason Frank
2005.09.27 04:25 "Re: Additional Lossless Compression Schemes", by <ron@debian.org>
2005.09.27 02:25 "Re: Additional Lossless Compression Schemes", by Leonard Rosenthol
2005.09.27 03:20 "Re: Additional Lossless Compression Schemes", by <ron@debian.org>

2005.09.25 01:01 "Re: Additional Lossless Compression Schemes", by Chris Cox

> > > But it doesn't have quite the flexibility that TIFF needs.
> >
> > How so?
> >
> > In so much as tiled support or something else?
>
> I second this question since JPEG is already supported by TIFF and 
> JPEG could be viewed as less flexible than JPEG2000.
>
> There are already vendors storing JPEG2000 in TIFF.  Of course that 
> does not mean it is a good idea.

Yeah - and at least one of them did the boneheaded move of storing an 
entire JP2 file inside the TIFF (with incorrect headers on the TIFF, 
no less).

I don't see a need to reproduce JPEG2000 in TIFF.  It already does 
what's needed on it's own.

Borrowing some of the better ideas and making them more flexible - 
that I'm all for.

Chris