2008.07.28 08:49 "[Tiff] CVS access", by Mateusz Łoskot
-
2008.07.28 13:01 "[Fwd: Re: [Tiff] CVS access]", by Edward Lam
- 2008.07.28 14:02 "Re: [Tiff] CVS access", by Mateusz Loskot
-
2008.08.11 20:55 "Re: [Tiff] windows 64 bit build", by Bob Friesenhahn
-
2008.08.11 19:35 "Re: [Tiff] windows 64 bit build", by Mikhail Kruk
- 2008.08.11 17:57 "[Tiff] windows 64 bit build", by Mikhail Kruk
- 2008.08.11 20:03 "Re: [Tiff] windows 64 bit build", by Edward Lam
- 2008.08.11 20:51 "Re: [Tiff] windows 64 bit build", by Bob Friesenhahn
-
2008.08.11 19:35 "Re: [Tiff] windows 64 bit build", by Mikhail Kruk
2008.07.28 23:17 "Re: [Tiff] CVS access", by Ryan Schmidt
On Jul 28, 2008, at 09:02, Mateusz Loskot wrote:
No, my guess is that you're looking at the hijacked domain, libtiff.org. Please go to the second google link instead... http://www.remotesensing.org/libtiff/
Thanks for reminding me what's the issue. I completely forgot libtiff.org has been hijacked domain.
Hijacked! That sucks. Is there no legal recourse available?
I was wondering why libtiff.org showed different versions than www.remotesensing.org/libtiff/. How are users meant to know that libtiff.org is not the real web site of the libtiff project? The real web site makes no mention of it...