AWARE [SYSTEMS] Imaging expertise for the Delphi developer
AWare Systems, Imaging expertise for the Delphi developer, Home TIFF and LibTiff Mailing List Archive

LibTiff Mailing List

TIFF and LibTiff Mailing List Archive
October 2000

Previous Thread
Next Thread

Previous by Thread
Next by Thread

Previous by Date
Next by Date

Contact

The TIFF Mailing List Homepage
This list is run by Frank Warmerdam
Archive maintained by AWare Systems



Valid HTML 4.01!



Thread

2000.10.05 00:20 "Old-style JPEG and HP 9100C Digital Sender", by Tim Bell
2000.10.05 03:39 "Re: Old-style JPEG and HP 9100C Digital Sender", by Niles Ritter
2000.10.05 19:43 "Re: Old-style JPEG and HP 9100C Digital Sender", by Rex Jolliff
2000.10.06 02:20 "Re: Old-style JPEG and HP 9100C Digital Sender", by Tom Lane
2000.10.06 04:44 "Re: Old-style JPEG and HP 9100C Digital Sender", by Raj Kumar S
2000.10.06 09:36 "Re: Old-style JPEG and HP 9100C Digital Sender", by Joris Van Damme
2000.10.06 13:50 "Re: Old-style JPEG and HP 9100C Digital Sender", by Frank Warmerdam
2000.10.06 13:31 "Re: Old-style JPEG and HP 9100C Digital Sender", by Ed Grissom
2000.10.06 14:21 "Re: Old-style JPEG and HP 9100C Digital Sender", by Martin Bailey
2000.10.06 14:44 "Re: Old-style JPEG and HP 9100C Digital Sender", by Ed Grissom
2000.10.06 15:04 "Re: Old-style JPEG and HP 9100C Digital Sender", by Martin Bailey
2000.10.06 15:07 "PDF is NOT proprietary!", by Leonard Rosenthol
2000.10.06 16:13 "Re: PDF is NOT proprietary!", by Ed Grissom
2000.10.06 16:32 "Re: PDF is NOT proprietary!", by Leonard Rosenthol
2000.10.06 16:35 "Re: PDF is NOT proprietary!", by Ed Grissom
2000.10.06 20:10 "Re: PDF is NOT proprietary!", by Bo Yang
2000.10.06 20:41 "Re: PDF is NOT proprietary!", by Ed Grissom
2000.10.06 21:35 "Re: PDF is NOT proprietary!", by Alex Cherepanov
2000.10.08 00:24 "Re: PDF is NOT proprietary!", by Leonard Rosenthol
2000.10.06 21:02 "Re: PDF is NOT proprietary!", by Larry Jones
2000.10.06 17:56 "Re: Old-style JPEG and HP 9100C Digital Sender", by Joris Van Damme
2000.10.06 10:36 "Re: Old-style JPEG and HP 9100C Digital Sender", by Martin Bailey
2000.10.07 06:03 "Re: Old-style JPEG and HP 9100C Digital Sender", by Joris Van Damme

2000.10.06 13:31 "Re: Old-style JPEG and HP 9100C Digital Sender", by Ed Grissom

In a previous message, Frank said:
> What all sorts of things do people want to put in a V7.0 
> spec? 

I agree with the items you mentioned:

1) end of O_JPEG
2) Deflate compression (end of LZW ??? nah, the patent 
   expires in 2003)
3) COMPLEX pixel values (int and double)

And want to add:

4) 64-bit offsets for files >4GB 
5) Uninstantiated Tiles/Strips
6) Multispctral Photometric type
7) Reduced Resolution Image Generation Method
8) Tiff Trees for multi-image with Reduced Resolution 
   versions for each image. (already adopted by Adobe) 

And have a few "to-be-discussed" items:

64-bit integer pixels ?
Transparent Value (not a mask)
"No Data" value
Wavelet compression 

  
> But even if it did
> fade in importance, is that the end of the world 
> if some new format is able to what needs to be done?  

As long as that format is not proprietary -- which is what 
Adobe wants (PDF) .  Other proprietary formats are making 
inroads -- MrSid, ECW etc.



Frank also quoted Joris as saying:
> Joris Van Damme wrote:
> > nor does it support tiled 
> > storage, for example (but these storage modes seem to 
> > add more complexity to tiff than usefullness sometimes).

We find that for large images accessed in a random manner 
(rather than sequential) strips are useless and tiles are 
the only way to go. 


--
ed grissom
egrissom@ziimaging.com