AWARE [SYSTEMS] Imaging expertise for the Delphi developer
AWare Systems, Imaging expertise for the Delphi developer, Home TIFF and LibTiff Mailing List Archive

LibTiff Mailing List

TIFF and LibTiff Mailing List Archive
July 2008

Previous Thread
Next Thread

Previous by Thread
Next by Thread

Previous by Date
Next by Date

Contact

The TIFF Mailing List Homepage
This list is run by Frank Warmerdam
Archive maintained by AWare Systems



Valid HTML 4.01!



Thread

2008.07.02 17:23 "BigTiff Support", by Alexander Johnson
2008.07.02 17:27 "BigTiff Support", by Alexander Johnson
2008.07.02 17:43 "Re: BigTiff Support", by Bob Friesenhahn
2008.07.02 18:07 "Re: BigTiff Support", by Edward Lam
2008.07.02 18:18 "Re: BigTiff Support", by Bob Friesenhahn
2008.07.02 18:47 "Re: BigTiff Support", by Edward Lam
2008.07.03 07:29 "Re: BigTiff Support", by Alexander Johnson
2008.07.03 14:58 "Re: eta for bigtiff support?", by Gary Mcgath
2008.07.03 15:26 "Re: eta for bigtiff support?", by Bob Friesenhahn
2008.07.03 15:28 "Re: eta for bigtiff support?", by Frank Warmerdam
2008.07.03 15:46 "Re: eta for bigtiff support?", by Gary Mcgath
2008.07.03 18:19 "Re: eta for bigtiff support?", by Stephen Carlsen
2008.07.10 21:07 "Re: eta for bigtiff support?", by Joris Van Damme
2008.07.10 21:50 "Re: eta for bigtiff support?", by Gary Mcgath
2008.07.10 23:17 "Re: eta for bigtiff support?", by Bob Friesenhahn
2008.07.10 23:25 "Re: eta for bigtiff support?", by Chris Cox
2008.07.11 00:36 "Re: eta for bigtiff support?", by Bob Friesenhahn
2008.07.11 00:38 "Re: eta for bigtiff support?", by Chris Cox
2008.07.11 12:56 "Re: eta for bigtiff support?", by Gary Mcgath
2008.07.11 16:34 "Re: eta for bigtiff support?", by Bob Friesenhahn
2008.07.11 13:25 "Re: eta for bigtiff support?", by Edward Lam
2008.07.02 17:32 "BigTiff Support", by Alexander Johnson

2008.07.03 07:29 "Re: BigTiff Support", by Alexander Johnson

Thanks for the info. I have been looking around and I have found an
Aperio version of libtiff where BigTiff have been implemented.  How
does this fair against the current official version 4.0 beta?

On Wed, Jul 2, 2008 at 7:47 PM, Edward Lam <edward@sidefx.com> wrote:
> Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
>>
>> Probably so.  For libtiff 'alpha' and 'beta' seem like fairly meaningless
>> terms.  For example "3.9.0beta" is clearly better than the formal 3.8.2
>> release.
>
> Even so, it would be good if it actually said on the website that
> implementation of the BigTIFF spec has been completed. I for one didn't
> touch 4.0 until beta because I didn't think it was worth my effort to do so
> earlier.
>
>> If people really want to see libtiff 4.0.0 formally released, they should
>> give it a serious try and report their findings (good or bad).
>
> I don't disagree with this. I'm just proposing that there is clearer
> messaging to that effect on the website.
>
> Cheers,
> -Edward
> _______________________________________________
> Tiff mailing list: Tiff@lists.maptools.org
> http://lists.maptools.org/mailman/listinfo/tiff
> http://www.remotesensing.org/libtiff/
>



-- 
Alex