LibTiff Mailing List
TIFF and LibTiff Mailing List Archive
July 2007
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Previous by Thread
Next by Thread
Previous by Date
Next by Date
Contact
The TIFF Mailing List Homepage
This list is run by Frank Warmerdam
Archive maintained by AWare Systems
Thread
2007.07.04 17:24 "Re: 16-Bit-Per-Channel Lossless Compression", by Andy Cave
Hi Stephen, Are you saying that LZW or Flate do not get 2:1? Have you tried either of these? What ratios do you get? Do you have some example files for testing with? I think if you can compress and write to disk faster than you can write, compression is always worth it. Sure storage space is getting larger and faster, but then CPUs are getting more and more cores, which can nicely do compression in parallel. Andy. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Stephen Carlsen" <sc42business@mac.com> To: <tiff@lists.maptools.org> Sent: Wednesday, July 04, 2007 6:13 PM Subject: [Tiff] 16-Bit-Per-Channel Lossless Compression > It seems to me that none of the lossless compression schemes commonly used > in TIFF are very effective at compressing 16 bit or 32 bit data. And, with > technologies such as Camera Raw gaining in popularity rapidly, there's a > lot more 16 bit data out there. > > If we can come up with a simple approach that gives us on the order of 2:1 > compression of 16 bit photographs, is this useful, or are storage space > and bandwidth now so inexpensive that we don't care any more? > _______________________________________________ > Tiff mailing list: Tiff@lists.maptools.org > http://lists.maptools.org/mailman/listinfo/tiff > http://www.remotesensing.org/libtiff/