AWARE [SYSTEMS] Imaging expertise for the Delphi developer
AWare Systems, Imaging expertise for the Delphi developer, Home TIFF and LibTiff Mailing List Archive

LibTiff Mailing List

TIFF and LibTiff Mailing List Archive
July 2007

Previous Thread
Next Thread

Previous by Thread
Next by Thread

Previous by Date
Next by Date

Contact

The TIFF Mailing List Homepage
This list is run by Frank Warmerdam
Archive maintained by AWare Systems



Valid HTML 4.01!



Thread

2007.07.03 18:37 "BigTIFF extension?", by Phil Harvey
2007.07.03 19:04 "Re: BigTIFF extension?", by Stephen Carlsen
2007.07.04 11:37 "Re: BigTIFF extension?", by Phil Harvey
2007.07.04 15:16 "Re: BigTIFF extension?", by Bob Friesenhahn
2007.07.04 15:58 "Re: BigTIFF extension?", by Phil Harvey
2007.07.04 17:13 "16-Bit-Per-Channel Lossless Compression", by Stephen Carlsen
2007.07.04 17:24 "Re: 16-Bit-Per-Channel Lossless Compression", by Andy Cave
2007.07.04 17:26 "Re: 16-Bit-Per-Channel Lossless Compression", by Andy Cave
2007.07.04 17:49 "Re: 16-Bit-Per-Channel Lossless Compression", by Stephen Carlsen
2007.07.04 18:00 "Re: 16-Bit-Per-Channel Lossless Compression", by Joris Van Damme
2007.07.04 18:02 "Re: 16-Bit-Per-Channel Lossless Compression", by Joris Van Damme
2007.07.04 18:59 "Re: 16-Bit-Per-Channel Lossless Compression", by Bob Friesenhahn
2007.07.04 20:37 "Re: 16-Bit-Per-Channel Lossless Compression", by Andy Cave
2007.07.04 21:40 "Re: 16-Bit-Per-Channel Lossless Compression", by Stephen Carlsen
2007.07.05 10:56 "Re: 16-Bit-Per-Channel Lossless Compression", by Andrey Kiselev
2007.07.05 17:58 "Re: 16-Bit-Per-Channel Lossless Compression", by Stephen Carlsen
2007.07.05 18:30 "Re: 16-Bit-Per-Channel Lossless Compression", by Joris Van Damme
2007.07.05 19:29 "Re: 16-Bit-Per-Channel Lossless Compression", by Stephen Carlsen
2007.07.06 01:46 "Re: 16-Bit-Per-Channel Lossless Compression", by Chris Cox
2007.07.09 15:35 "Re: 16-Bit-Per-Channel Lossless Compression", by Andrey Kiselev
2007.07.09 20:13 "Re: 16-Bit-Per-Channel Lossless Compression", by Chris Cox
2007.07.10 07:29 "Re: 16-Bit-Per-Channel Lossless Compression", by Andrey Kiselev
2007.07.10 18:54 "Re: 16-Bit-Per-Channel Lossless Compression", by Chris Cox
2007.07.05 12:03 "Re: 16-Bit-Per-Channel Lossless Compression", by Andy Cave
2007.07.05 12:57 "Re: 16-Bit-Per-Channel Lossless Compression", by Andrey Kiselev
2007.07.05 15:08 "Re: 16-Bit-Per-Channel Lossless Compression", by Andy Cave
2007.07.05 16:02 "Re: 16-Bit-Per-Channel Lossless Compression", by Andrey Kiselev
2007.07.05 16:56 "Re: 16-Bit-Per-Channel Lossless Compression", by Andy Cave
2007.07.05 13:45 "Re: 16-Bit-Per-Channel Lossless Compression", by Joris Van Damme
2007.07.05 14:26 "Re: 16-Bit-Per-Channel Lossless Compression", by Andrey Kiselev
2007.07.05 16:02 "Re: 16-Bit-Per-Channel Lossless Compression", by Bob Friesenhahn
2007.07.05 16:30 "Re: 16-Bit-Per-Channel Lossless Compression", by Joris Van Damme
2007.07.04 17:28 "Re: 16-Bit-Per-Channel Lossless Compression", by Michael Wolf
2007.07.04 18:02 "Re: 16-Bit-Per-Channel Lossless Compression", by Stephen Carlsen
2007.07.04 17:36 "Re: 16-Bit-Per-Channel Lossless Compression", by Andrew Brooks
2007.07.04 11:53 "Re: BigTIFF extension?", by Phil Harvey
2007.07.03 19:09 "Re: BigTIFF extension?", by Bob Friesenhahn
2007.07.03 19:17 "Re: BigTIFF extension?", by Andy Cave

2007.07.04 17:26 "Re: 16-Bit-Per-Channel Lossless Compression", by Andy Cave

PS With LZW, have you tried with prediction enabled? That should improve the 
compression ratio on 16 bit ints.

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Andy Cave" <andy.cave@hamillroad.com>
To: <tiff@lists.maptools.org>; "Stephen Carlsen" <sc42business@mac.com>
Sent: Wednesday, July 04, 2007 6:24 PM
Subject: Re: [Tiff] 16-Bit-Per-Channel Lossless Compression


> Hi Stephen,
>
> Are you saying that LZW or Flate do not get 2:1? Have you tried either of 
> these? What ratios do you get?
>
> Do you have some example files for testing with?
>
> I think if you can compress and write to disk faster than you can write, 
> compression is always worth it. Sure storage space is getting larger and 
> faster, but then CPUs are getting more and more cores, which can nicely do 
> compression in parallel.
>
> Andy.
>
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Stephen Carlsen" <sc42business@mac.com>
> To: <tiff@lists.maptools.org>
> Sent: Wednesday, July 04, 2007 6:13 PM
> Subject: [Tiff] 16-Bit-Per-Channel Lossless Compression
>
>
>> It seems to me that none of the lossless compression schemes commonly 
>> used in TIFF are very effective at compressing 16 bit or 32 bit data. 
>> And, with technologies such as Camera Raw gaining in popularity rapidly, 
>> there's a lot more 16 bit data out there.
>>
>> If we can come up with a simple approach that gives us on the order of 
>> 2:1 compression of 16 bit photographs, is this useful, or are storage 
>> space and bandwidth now so inexpensive that we don't care any more?
>> _______________________________________________
>> Tiff mailing list: Tiff@lists.maptools.org
>> http://lists.maptools.org/mailman/listinfo/tiff
>> http://www.remotesensing.org/libtiff/
>