AWARE [SYSTEMS] Imaging expertise for the Delphi developer
AWare Systems, Imaging expertise for the Delphi developer, Home TIFF and LibTiff Mailing List Archive

LibTiff Mailing List

TIFF and LibTiff Mailing List Archive
July 2007

Previous Thread
Next Thread

Previous by Thread
Next by Thread

Previous by Date
Next by Date

Contact

The TIFF Mailing List Homepage
This list is run by Frank Warmerdam
Archive maintained by AWare Systems



Valid HTML 4.01!



Thread

2007.07.04 16:56 "BigTIFF extension", by Kemp Watson
2007.07.04 17:35 "Re: BigTIFF extension", by Andrew Brooks
2007.07.04 18:13 "Re: BigTIFF extension", by John Aldridge
2007.07.04 18:51 "Re: BigTIFF extension", by Toby Thain
2007.07.05 10:27 "Re: BigTIFF extension", by Andrey Kiselev
2007.07.04 18:25 "Re: BigTIFF extension", by Phil Harvey
2007.07.04 18:52 "Re: BigTIFF extension", by Toby Thain
2007.07.04 19:59 "Re: BigTIFF extension", by Phil Harvey
2007.07.04 21:23 "BigTIFF extension", by <kemp@extelligence.net>
2007.07.04 21:36 "Re: BigTIFF extension", by Toby Thain
2007.07.05 05:08 "Re: BigTIFF extension", by Joris Van Damme
2007.07.04 22:11 "Re: BigTIFF extension", by Stephen Carlsen
2007.07.05 02:41 "Re: BigTIFF extension", by Joris Van Damme
2007.07.05 04:19 "Re: BigTIFF extension", by Kemp Watson
2007.07.05 04:54 "Re: BigTIFF extension", by Stephen Carlsen
2007.07.05 15:54 "Re: BigTIFF extension", by Toby Thain
2007.07.05 16:18 "Re: BigTIFF extension", by Joris Van Damme
2007.07.05 16:51 "Re: BigTIFF extension", by Andrew Brooks
2007.07.04 20:52 "Re: BigTIFF extension", by Joris Van Damme
2007.07.04 21:04 "Re: BigTIFF extension", by Toby Thain
2007.07.05 05:07 "Re: BigTIFF extension", by Joris Van Damme
2007.07.05 10:06 "Re: BigTIFF extension", by John Aldridge
2007.07.05 13:23 "Re: Tiff Digest, Vol 38, Issue 12", by Gary Mcgath
2007.07.05 13:56 "Re: Tiff Digest, Vol 38, Issue 12", by Joris Van Damme
2007.07.05 14:14 "Re: Tiff Digest, Vol 38, Issue 12", by Gary Mcgath
2007.07.05 14:39 "Re: Tiff Digest, Vol 38, Issue 12", by Joris Van Damme
2007.07.05 21:04 "Re: Tiff Digest, Vol 38, Issue 12", by Chris Cox
2007.07.05 21:38 "Re: Tiff Digest, Vol 38, Issue 12", by Joris Van Damme
2007.07.05 22:02 "Re: Tiff Digest, Vol 38, Issue 12", by Toby Thain
2007.07.05 15:26 "Re: Tiff Digest, Vol 38, Issue 12", by Andrey Kiselev
2007.07.05 16:23 "Re: BigTIFF", by Gary Mcgath
2007.07.05 16:54 "Re: BigTIFF", by Joris Van Damme
2007.07.05 18:51 "Re: BigTIFF", by Craig Bruce
2007.07.05 20:30 "Re: BigTIFF", by Gary Mcgath
2007.07.05 21:03 "Re: BigTIFF", by Joris Van Damme
2007.07.05 20:14 "Re: BigTIFF", by Michael Wolf
2007.07.05 08:09 "Re: BigTIFF extension", by Andy Cave
2007.07.05 13:40 "Re: BigTIFF extension", by Joris Van Damme
2007.07.05 21:00 "Re: BigTIFF extension", by Chris Cox
2007.07.05 21:19 "Re: BigTIFF extension", by Joris Van Damme
2007.07.05 22:13 "Re: BigTIFF extension", by Bob Friesenhahn
2007.07.06 12:36 "Re: BigTIFF extension", by Gary Mcgath
2007.07.09 14:10 "Re: BigTIFF extension", by Joris Van Damme
2007.07.09 15:11 "Re: BigTIFF extension", by Toby Thain
2007.07.09 16:11 "Re: BigTIFF extension", by Stephen Carlsen
2007.07.09 16:21 "Re: BigTIFF extension", by Andy Cave
2007.07.09 16:25 "Re: BigTIFF extension", by Gary Mcgath
2007.07.09 16:35 "Re: BigTIFF extension", by Toby Thain
2007.07.09 18:36 "Re: BigTIFF extension", by Phil Harvey
2007.07.05 16:26 "Re: BigTIFF extension", by Joris Van Damme
2007.07.05 18:56 "Re: BigTIFF extension", by Toby Thain
2007.07.04 19:17 "Re: BigTIFF extension", by Frank Warmerdam
2007.07.05 20:31 "Re: BigTIFF extension", by Chris Cox
2007.07.04 19:13 "Re: BigTIFF extension", by Bob Friesenhahn
2007.07.05 16:32 "Re: BigTIFF extension", by Kemp Watson
2007.07.05 18:10 "Re: BigTIFF extension", by Joris Van Damme

2007.07.05 13:23 "Re: Tiff Digest, Vol 38, Issue 12", by Gary Mcgath

John Aldridge wrote:

> Joris wrote:
>> 1) BigTIFF is TIFF.
> 
> No it's not :-) It's not in the TIFF specification
> 
>    http://partners.adobe.com/public/developer/en/tiff/TIFF6.pdf
> 
> which also claims that TIFF is an Adobe trademark, so presumably they 
> are the people entitled to specify it!

There's a bit of revisionism in the BigTIFF description. The proposal on 
awaresystems.be refers to the value at offset 2 as a "Version number," 
which is 42 for "classic TIFF" and 43 for BigTIFF. Yet the TIFF 6.0 
specification says that at bytes 2-3 the value is 42, which is "An 
arbitrary but carefully chosen number (42) that further identifies the 
file as a TIFF file." This is NOT a version number. TIFF is annoying in 
that there is no version number specification; you can tell what version 
was used to write a TIFF file only by what features are used. But 
putting the number 43 at offset 2 is a statement that the file is not 
any version of TIFF.

Since BigTIFF diverges from the specification to distinguish itself from 
TIFF, it should be considered not a version of TIFF, but as a different 
file format (albeit one derived from TIFF).



-- 
Gary McGath
Digital Library Software Engineer
Harvard University Library Office for Information Systems
http://hul.harvard.edu/~gary/index.html