AWARE [SYSTEMS] Imaging expertise for the Delphi developer
AWare Systems, Imaging expertise for the Delphi developer, Home TIFF and LibTiff Mailing List Archive

LibTiff Mailing List

TIFF and LibTiff Mailing List Archive
August 2006

Previous Thread
Next Thread

Previous by Thread
Next by Thread

Previous by Date
Next by Date

Contact

The TIFF Mailing List Homepage
This list is run by Frank Warmerdam
Archive maintained by AWare Systems



Valid HTML 4.01!



Thread

2006.08.24 07:29 "IPTC tag", by Joris Van Damme
2006.08.24 17:45 "Re: IPTC tag", by Phil Harvey
2006.08.25 13:30 "Re: IPTC tag", by Joris Van Damme
2006.08.25 17:37 "Re: IPTC tag", by Phil Harvey
2006.08.25 18:30 "Re: IPTC tag", by Chris Cox
2006.08.29 17:39 "Re: IPTC tag", by Joris Van Damme
2006.08.25 18:43 "Re: IPTC tag", by Chris Cox
2006.08.24 21:34 "Re: IPTC tag", by Chris Cox
2006.08.25 11:15 "Re: IPTC tag", by Joris Van Damme
2006.08.25 15:36 "Re: IPTC tag", by Bob Friesenhahn
2006.08.25 15:56 "Re: IPTC tag", by Joris Van Damme
2006.08.25 18:50 "Re: IPTC tag", by Chris Cox
2006.08.29 15:47 "Re: IPTC tag", by Joris Van Damme

2006.08.25 18:43 "Re: IPTC tag", by Chris Cox

What I posted will always work if the file is written correctly (and does -
we have zero failures for non-corrupt files).
If you mistakenly byteswapped the IPTC tag - then Photoshop will not be able
to read it, because the data is not written correctly.
If Libtiff is byteswapping IPTC tags - then LibTIFF needs to fix that bug
ASAP and stop writing corrupt files.
Also, any software that tries to re-byteswap IPTC tags is incorrect and
needs to be fixed (but I've never seen or heard of that).

Chris


-----Original Message-----
From: tiff-bounces@lists.maptools.org on behalf of Joris
Sent: Fri 8/25/2006 6:30 AM
To: Phil Harvey; tiff@lists.maptools.org
Subject: Re: [Tiff] IPTC tag
 
Phil,

Phil Harvey wrote:
> I have found at least one utility (Nikon Capture) that won't read IPTC
> information unless the format LONG, and as you mentioned this is the
> way it is written by Adobe.  So I don't think any IPTC support would
> be very useful unless it reads and writes as LONG too.

I just don't buy that sort of reasoning anymore... In my other post, I
think I've clearly shown that the scheme Chris Cox mentions is the
reading strategy implemented in Photoshop, misses out on some files very
likely otherwise suspected to contain valid IPTC data (all files written
by LibTiff, with byte order different from machine byte order and IPTC
data written as longs, plus all files with IPTC data written as longs by
any library at all, and subsequently byte order reversed by tiff
handling software (like simple page concat!) an oneven number of times,
plus...).